RE: [fw-wiz] Intel vs. special purpose FW-1 servers
From: Marcus J. Ranum (mjr_at_ranum.com)
Date: 07/25/05
- Previous message: Ionut Boldizsar: "RE: [fw-wiz] Intel vs. special purpose FW-1 servers"
- Maybe in reply to: Emily Conrad: "[fw-wiz] Intel vs. special purpose FW-1 servers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: "Ionut Boldizsar" <ionut@provision.ro> Date: Sun, 24 Jul 2005 19:53:23 -0400
Ionut Boldizsar wrote:
>I somehow believe that security related software should be
>update/maintained as much as possible.
I think the industry places entirely the wrong emphasis on updating
and patching software. I believe that security related software
should never need patching or updating. If you're exposing software
to the Internet and you know it's such a buggy wad of tripe that it
needs a patch once a month - you're using the wrong software and
you need to re-assess your overall system design.
mjr.
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: Ionut Boldizsar: "RE: [fw-wiz] Intel vs. special purpose FW-1 servers"
- Maybe in reply to: Emily Conrad: "[fw-wiz] Intel vs. special purpose FW-1 servers"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]