Re: FW: [fw-wiz] VOIP versus PBX
From: Michael H (af_pilot33_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 07/21/05
- Previous message: Paul D. Robertson: "Re: FW: [fw-wiz] VOIP versus PBX"
- In reply to: Paul D. Robertson: "Re: FW: [fw-wiz] VOIP versus PBX"
- Next in thread: Elizabeth Zwicky: "Re: [fw-wiz] VOIP versus PBX"
- Reply: Elizabeth Zwicky: "Re: [fw-wiz] VOIP versus PBX"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: paul@compuwar.net Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 13:55:36 -0700
From: "Paul D. Robertson" <paul@compuwar.net>
> We just moved to a VoIP system and the 911 calls are routed through them
but
> with our address and number shown as the source. Part of the approval
> process is us actually calling 911 with a test call and validating what
they
> see.
But are your calls routed to a national center for your VIOP provider with
their tracking info, or directly to your local municipal E911 center?
As far as I recall, the VoIP providers were all doing it to their own call
centers if they were doing it at all.
>>Good question. I know they are doing something because we won't be
>>accepting the system until I can call 911 and they
>>have the right info. I assume it's to their center and from their
>>to our local 911 office.
> In reference to previous posts on security, this company is addressing
that
> by us using a dedicated t1 through their offices. This way they control
the
> connection from our phone eventually to a POTS connection. This seems
like a
> decent idea for keeping folks who are not customers from disrupting the
> system but I'm a little worried about those who are customers.
If you're still paying for a T-1, then I assume your savings are all local
loop and potentially IXC charges?
>>Well here's the deal, they will also route our data traffic so we will
>>be eventually switching off our current T-1. We are also getting two T-1's
>>for some redundancy since I'm a little nervous. All of our remote
>>employees will be getting Cisco phones and will of course just use
>>their local broadband connection (this is where we expect significant
>>savings) though they also offer a service for home users (ISDN or T-1).
>>Of course the home user experience won't always be perfect but
>>many folks have gotten good connections via Vonage, Skype, etc.
>>They remote users will now be truely connected and managed by
>>us where as they haven't been in the past.
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: Paul D. Robertson: "Re: FW: [fw-wiz] VOIP versus PBX"
- In reply to: Paul D. Robertson: "Re: FW: [fw-wiz] VOIP versus PBX"
- Next in thread: Elizabeth Zwicky: "Re: [fw-wiz] VOIP versus PBX"
- Reply: Elizabeth Zwicky: "Re: [fw-wiz] VOIP versus PBX"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|