Re: [fw-wiz] The Death Of A Firewall
From: Kerry Thompson (kez_at_crypt.gen.nz)
Date: 07/19/05
- Previous message: Marcus J. Ranum: "Re: [fw-wiz] The Death Of A Firewall"
- In reply to: James Paterson: "[fw-wiz] The Death Of A Firewall"
- Next in thread: Martin Hoz: "Re: [fw-wiz] The Death Of A Firewall"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 16:12:23 +1200
On Sat, 2005-07-09 at 17:33 -0400, James Paterson wrote:
http://www.securitypipeline.com/165700439
>
> Be interesting to get the communities take on this article.
>
It was covered on slashdot a couple of weeks ago.
It starts off with grand contentious statements such as "I proposed to
our technology architects that we eliminate our network firewalls", but
in the details we see that they implement a tiered structure with a DMZ
and ACLs on layer-3 switches, which from a distance looks a lot like a
firewall structure to me.
So, they seem to have got rid of the commercial boxes with "FIREWALL" on
the front, and implemented defence in depth. Good on them for thinking
about the problem and implementing a nice workable solution, but its
hardly new.
-- Kerry Thompson CCNA CISSP http://www.crypt.gen.nz _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: Marcus J. Ranum: "Re: [fw-wiz] The Death Of A Firewall"
- In reply to: James Paterson: "[fw-wiz] The Death Of A Firewall"
- Next in thread: Martin Hoz: "Re: [fw-wiz] The Death Of A Firewall"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
