[fw-wiz] so much for "deny all"
From: Tina Bird (tbird_at_precision-guesswork.com)
Date: 06/07/05
- Previous message: R. DuFresne: "Re: [fw-wiz] Ok, so now we have a firewall, we're safe, right?"
- Next in thread: Dave Piscitello: "Re: [fw-wiz] so much for "deny all""
- Reply: Dave Piscitello: "Re: [fw-wiz] so much for "deny all""
- Reply: Adam Jones: "Re: [fw-wiz] so much for "deny all""
- Reply: Rob Hughes: "Re: [fw-wiz] so much for "deny all""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: <firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com> Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 09:41:26 -0700
From the TechTarget coverage of the Gartner Security Summit this week:
"Next generation firewalls that do deep-packet inspections from vendors like
Juniper Networks, Check Point and Fortinet employ a heuristics engine and
allow all network traffic and behavior, except those which policy says it
must block. Most enterprises, however, refresh their firewall purchases on a
three- to five-year cycle and that makes it challenging to synch new
features."
*sigh*
<http://searchwindowssecurity.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid45_
gci1095755,00.html?track=NL-122&ad=518233> (site requires free registration)
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: R. DuFresne: "Re: [fw-wiz] Ok, so now we have a firewall, we're safe, right?"
- Next in thread: Dave Piscitello: "Re: [fw-wiz] so much for "deny all""
- Reply: Dave Piscitello: "Re: [fw-wiz] so much for "deny all""
- Reply: Adam Jones: "Re: [fw-wiz] so much for "deny all""
- Reply: Rob Hughes: "Re: [fw-wiz] so much for "deny all""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|