RE: Going meta (was RE: [fw-wiz] Ok, so now we have a firewall...)
From: Marcus J. Ranum (mjr_at_ranum.com)
Date: 06/03/05
- Previous message: Marcus J. Ranum: "Re: [fw-wiz] Ok, so now we have a firewall, we're safe, right?"
- Maybe in reply to: Marcus J. Ranum: "Going meta (was RE: [fw-wiz] Ok, so now we have a firewall...)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: "Bill McGee (bam)" <bam@cisco.com>, "Mark Tinberg" <mtinberg@securepipe.com> Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2005 20:19:17 -0400
Bill McGee \(bam\) wrote:
>I don’t think so. The problem, as I see it, is that the whole issue is moving so rapidly that the number of folks out there that can orchestrate their entire security strategy while the ground shifts under their feet is woefully small
Master Sun Tzu once wrote, "If you think you have a strategy, and it is
constantly changing - it's not a strategy. It's tactics. And if you mistake
tactics for strategy, then you know nothing of either."
OK. He didn't really say that, but it wouldn't sound as cool coming from
my mouth so I stuffed my humble thoughts in his.
mjr.
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: Marcus J. Ranum: "Re: [fw-wiz] Ok, so now we have a firewall, we're safe, right?"
- Maybe in reply to: Marcus J. Ranum: "Going meta (was RE: [fw-wiz] Ok, so now we have a firewall...)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]