Re: [fw-wiz] Ok, so now we have a firewall, we're safe, right?

From: Chris Blask (chris_at_blask.org)
Date: 05/30/05

  • Next message: Ben Nagy: "RE: [fw-wiz] Ok, so now we have a firewall, we're safe, right?"
    To: "Paul D. Robertson" <paul@compuwar.net>, firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
    Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 13:17:20 -0400
    
    

    Hello, critters!

    At 12:18 PM 5/30/2005, Paul D. Robertson wrote:
    .d.
    >If ever there were a wakeup call for people to start analyzing their
    >firewall logs, this is it- nobody at any of the companies involved figured
    >this out due to firewall logs, an author figured it out because their
    >unpublished book was leaking.

    My last gig obviously has me biased (Protego - no current relationship so
    no axe to grind), but it seems to me that unless you can consume and
    process logs from fws (at the very absolute minimum) you are doomed to
    walking around with a fire extinguisher for a living.

    o Authenticate and repudiate and investigate and remediate until you're
    blue in the face, but an inability to see the patterns evolving on the
    network makes it all a matter of treading water (which beats drowning, but
    it gets old quick).

    o If - on the other hand - you *can* see the patterns on the network, then
    what specific things you choose to do about it become obvious, you can
    target the work that you do to improve your posture, and you can have a
    high level of confidence that you will know whether it worked or not.

    Find some solution that can consume all the logs from all your network
    devices (fw, id/ps, routers/switches/vpn, servers, desktop management...)
    and show you maps of your network and what is/has happened, and how those
    data points relate to eachother. I've seen 600,000,000 events/day come
    into a box doing such things at a live site, so you just are not going to
    do it with an Erector Set, and even trying to puts the fire extinguisher
    back in your hand.

    You want to get into the role of watching the known behavior of your
    network and using your human intelligence to tune that behavior to fit the
    needs of the people who pay for it's upkeep. You want to get out of the
    role of spending all your time figuring out how to fix the broken window
    someone ran a cable out of.

    Cisco now has a set of boxes that do that stuff off the shelf, other
    vendors are sure to do the same. One way or another, you should all be
    able to get out of the well and see the world around you at some point in
    the next little while, and I'm interested in seeing how that changes the
    battlescape... :-)

    .d.
    >Seems to also intimate the Trojan being injected via autorun CDs. Anyone
    >require users to provide copies of CDs received in the mail to their
    >security department for later evidence gathering?
    >
    >AV isn't going to be effective against most custom Trojan Horses. We're
    >going to see more of this in the future- "Hey, I'm a Volvo dealer- I don't
    >have anything important on-line" or "We're a hardware store, we couldn't
    >possibly be a target!" Guess what? It doesn't take much to get those
    >cross-hairs pointed at you, no matter what line of business you're in.

    Which is exactly why it's time to crawl out of the well and take the higher
    perspective. It is good to try to control the human aspect and the
    endpoint they interact with, but there may always be code floating around
    and users doing silly things. The fact that we again create the necessary
    capability in time to do so is yet another example of why the Good Guys can
    always win the Battle [but there will still be fatalities, so be smart and
    don't be one!], and why I remain such a persistent optimist... ;-)

    Today, imho, the best improvement in posture to be gained by a given amount
    of resource is to get yourself a perspective on what your network is doing.

    -woof!

    -chris

    Chris Blask
    chris@blask.org
    http://blaskworks.blogspot.com

    _______________________________________________
    firewall-wizards mailing list
    firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
    http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards


  • Next message: Ben Nagy: "RE: [fw-wiz] Ok, so now we have a firewall, we're safe, right?"

    Relevant Pages

    • [fw-wiz] Ok, so now we have a firewall, were safe, right?
      ... firewall logs, this is it- nobody at any of the companies involved figured ... Seems to also intimate the Trojan being injected via autorun CDs. ... AV isn't going to be effective against most custom Trojan Horses. ... Paul D. Robertson "My statements in this message are personal opinions ...
      (Firewall-Wizards)
    • Re: pf.conf + Norton Antivirus -question
      ... I will try to flush states before the next virus update. ... for logging purposes because our network is filled ... >># Block access to certain networks ... Check your firewall logs. ...
      (comp.unix.bsd.openbsd.misc)
    • Re: Strange Logon Failure
      ... but complete log on this account. ... >Some one is trying to access a share via network logon to ... >firewall logs to see if anything matches up by time to ... >> Benjamin. ...
      (microsoft.public.security)
    • Re: Adding a new computer to existing home office network
      ... Check the new pc's firewall logs if any, and Event Viewer logs; ... computers on the network, while the other computers can see but can ... Administrator ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.network_web)
    • Re: Scanning tool?
      ... IDS and firewall logs are useful. ... In general, on a given network, it's ... for systems from client segments and such that are sending outbound mail is ... > I wanted to ask everyone in the group what they are using to track trends ...
      (microsoft.public.security)