Re: [fw-wiz] A fun smackdown...
From: Adam Shostack (adam_at_homeport.org)
Date: 05/21/05
- Previous message: Marcus J. Ranum: "Re: [fw-wiz] A fun smackdown..."
- In reply to: Marcus J. Ranum: "Re: [fw-wiz] A fun smackdown..."
- Next in thread: Ryan McBride: "Re: [fw-wiz] A fun smackdown..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: "Marcus J. Ranum" <mjr@ranum.com> Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 17:48:03 -0400
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 03:55:29PM -0400, Marcus J. Ranum wrote:
| Chuck Swiger wrote:
| >You've asserted that all standards are useless. You've asserted that standards which do not take security into account are not internet-worthy. You seem to believe that no Internet standard is legitimate and all traffic must be considered dangerous.
|
| OK. Why don't you list for us, real quickly, the internet application
| protocols that haven't had a security vulnerability so far.
|
| I'm all ears. Start your engines. Go!
|
| mjr.
| (PS - chargen?)
Chargen, like echo, can be turned into a DOS with the aid of a little
ip forgery.
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: Marcus J. Ranum: "Re: [fw-wiz] A fun smackdown..."
- In reply to: Marcus J. Ranum: "Re: [fw-wiz] A fun smackdown..."
- Next in thread: Ryan McBride: "Re: [fw-wiz] A fun smackdown..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|