Re: [fw-wiz] A fun smackdown...

From: Chuck Swiger (chuck_at_codefab.com)
Date: 05/19/05

  • Next message: Paul Melson: "RE: [fw-wiz] Thoughts on the new Cisco ASA 5500 firewalls"
    To: "Paul D. Robertson" <paul@compuwar.net>
    Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 09:57:42 -0400
    
    

    On May 19, 2005, at 9:04 AM, Paul D. Robertson wrote:
    > On Tue, 17 May 2005, Martin wrote:
    >> "Be liberal in what you accept; be strict in what you send."
    >
    > _All_ effective security controls break that tenet. The more liberal
    > your
    > controls, the more risk you assume.

    There is more to an effective security control than only denying stuff!
      I think you're over-valuing the utility of "deep protocol inspection",
    Paul, and you seem to be ignoring the risks of denying legitimate
    connections which should have been permitted.

    An effective security measure needs to implement the security policy.
    It needs to permit the types of access that legitimate users are
    allowed to have, for the system-- meaning the network, the firewall,
    and the server(s) or other equipment being used-- to work correctly.
    This is just as important as denying access to stuff that is not
    permitted by the security policy.

    Has "fixup protocol smtp 25" actually done much to prevent a vulnerable
    M$ Exchange box from being owned, or helped control the flow of
    spammy/virusized traffic significantly? Does it help control outbound
    malicious SMTP traffic? Has it ever happened that a firewall itself
    ends up with buffer overflow bugs in it's own code, trying to implement
    all the per-protocol stuff?

    If you want to manage SMTP securely, blocking port 25 in both
    directions while permitting only your MX box(es) through would do a
    heck of a lot more good than the protocol inspection does.

    -- 
    -Chuck
    _______________________________________________
    firewall-wizards mailing list
    firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
    http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
    

  • Next message: Paul Melson: "RE: [fw-wiz] Thoughts on the new Cisco ASA 5500 firewalls"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Start spreading the news.....
      ... the infinite possibilities that a larger gathering offers ... I see the permit as a means of control... ... people were up against the ropes and not wanting to cower to the USFS and the NRMT permit ?? ...
      (alt.gathering.rainbow)
    • Re: Start spreading the news.....
      ... >> mention how much easier to control the smaller numbers are). ... > I see the permit as a means of control... ... > saying they support the signing of permits. ...
      (alt.gathering.rainbow)
    • Re: rounding
      ... > How can I round a real number in Fortran? ... There are several that permit you to control the type ...
      (comp.lang.fortran)
    • Re: I think no...
      ... at this point I think it's the listview's control that don't permit this ... THX ... Prev by Date: ...
      (microsoft.public.access.forms)