RE: [fw-wiz] Hopefully not too OT
MHawkins_at_TULLIB.COM
Date: 05/03/05
- Previous message: Paul Melson: "RE: [fw-wiz] PIX -> ISA -> OWA Configuration"
- Maybe in reply to: jimmy_at_chickenhollow.net: "[fw-wiz] Hopefully not too OT"
- Next in thread: Paul D. Robertson: "RE: [fw-wiz] Hopefully not too OT"
- Reply: Paul D. Robertson: "RE: [fw-wiz] Hopefully not too OT"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: barney@databus.com, mjr@ranum.com Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 09:57:44 -0400
For some reason, most people look at their computer and think it is
inherently safe in the world. But when they look at almost anything else
they use or own, they intuitively see and know it is at risk at all times.
Car, house, boat, family, wine collection, iPod - they are all seen as being
at risk of being stolen, burned, crashed or otherwise meeting with some
nefarious or accidental event.
Why do people think differently of their computers?
Mike Hawkins
Office: 212-208-3888
Mobile: 917-887-3614
-----Original Message-----
From: firewall-wizards-admin@honor.icsalabs.com
[mailto:firewall-wizards-admin@honor.icsalabs.com] On Behalf Of Barney Wolff
Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 9:01 PM
To: Marcus J. Ranum
Cc: Ben Nagy; jimmy@chickenhollow.net; firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
Subject: Re: [fw-wiz] Hopefully not too OT
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 06:10:41PM -0400, Marcus J. Ranum wrote:
>
> What disturbs me most is that whenever you say the words
> "trusted computing" in some environments, people's minds
> shut down and they start saying "NO! We don't want to go
> there!" -- the same people who, seconds before, were
> listing the requirements for their next-generation computer
> systems and were basically saying they needed trusted
> computing platforms.
It all depends on whose requirements are being met. I'm happy about
trusted computing if my own requirements are met. Much less happy
if it's somebody else's, who did not pay for my computer.
-- Barney Wolff http://www.databus.com/bwresume.pdf I never met a computer I didn't like. _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------- The information contained in this email is confidential and may also contain privileged information. Sender does not waive confidentiality or legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender immediately; you should not retain this message or disclose its content to anyone. Internet communications are not secure or error free and the sender does not accept any liability for the content of the email. Although emails are routinely screened for viruses, the sender does not accept responsibility for any damage caused. Replies to this email may be monitored. For more information about the Collins Stewart Tullett group of companies please visit the following web site: www.cstplc.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------- _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: Paul Melson: "RE: [fw-wiz] PIX -> ISA -> OWA Configuration"
- Maybe in reply to: jimmy_at_chickenhollow.net: "[fw-wiz] Hopefully not too OT"
- Next in thread: Paul D. Robertson: "RE: [fw-wiz] Hopefully not too OT"
- Reply: Paul D. Robertson: "RE: [fw-wiz] Hopefully not too OT"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|