RE: [fw-wiz] Hopefully not too OT
From: Behm, Jeffrey L. (BehmJL_at_bvsg.com)
Date: 05/02/05
- Previous message: Paul Melson: "RE: [fw-wiz] PIX -> ISA -> OWA Configuration"
- Maybe in reply to: jimmy_at_chickenhollow.net: "[fw-wiz] Hopefully not too OT"
- Next in thread: Paul D. Robertson: "Re: [fw-wiz] Hopefully not too OT"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: <firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com> Date: Mon, 2 May 2005 16:09:00 -0500
OTOH, You might be able to sell it to the company downstairs as a
"service" to help defray your own costs.
On Monday, May 02, 2005 1:03 PM, David Thiel spake:
>On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 07:29:48AM +0000, jimmy@chickenhollow.net
wrote:
>
>> I have been pondering putting an 802.11 jammer on site at each
>> location (again, we don't use wireless, so it should not impair
>> anything) and thought that might be a cheaper option.
>
>I thought about that too, but it also occurred to me that the company
>downstairs might not appreciate it. I suspect You could easily run into
>some legal problems doing wireless jamming.
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: Paul Melson: "RE: [fw-wiz] PIX -> ISA -> OWA Configuration"
- Maybe in reply to: jimmy_at_chickenhollow.net: "[fw-wiz] Hopefully not too OT"
- Next in thread: Paul D. Robertson: "Re: [fw-wiz] Hopefully not too OT"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]