Re: [fw-wiz] Hopefully not too OT
From: David Thiel (lx_at_redundancy.redundancy.org)
Date: 05/02/05
- Previous message: jimmy_at_chickenhollow.net: "[fw-wiz] Hopefully not too OT"
- In reply to: jimmy_at_chickenhollow.net: "[fw-wiz] Hopefully not too OT"
- Next in thread: Shimon Silberschlag: "[fw-wiz] Management, Security and best practices for HSM & ATM networks"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com Date: Mon, 2 May 2005 11:02:45 -0700
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 07:29:48AM +0000, jimmy@chickenhollow.net wrote:
> I have been pondering putting an 802.11 jammer on site at each
> location (again, we don't use wireless, so it should not impair
> anything) and thought that might be a cheaper option.
I thought about that too, but it also occurred to me that the company
downstairs might not appreciate it. I suspect You could easily run into
some legal problems doing wireless jamming.
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: jimmy_at_chickenhollow.net: "[fw-wiz] Hopefully not too OT"
- In reply to: jimmy_at_chickenhollow.net: "[fw-wiz] Hopefully not too OT"
- Next in thread: Shimon Silberschlag: "[fw-wiz] Management, Security and best practices for HSM & ATM networks"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|