Re: [fw-wiz] Biometrics
From: Paul D. Robertson (paul_at_compuwar.net)
Date: 04/14/05
- Previous message: Adam Shostack: "Re: [fw-wiz] Biometrics"
- In reply to: Foley, Denys: "[fw-wiz] Biometrics"
- Next in thread: Adrian Grigorof: "Re: [fw-wiz] Biometrics"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: "Foley, Denys" <Denys.Foley@xerox.com> Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 10:07:20 -0400 (EDT)
On Sat, 9 Apr 2005, Foley, Denys wrote:
> The newer better-fingerprint readers also make sure that the finger is
> alive and warm - still attached to its original host. Check the specs
> !!!!
1. That doesn't matter if the attacker thinks they can get around it, the
cost to the attacker is relatively low, the cost to the defender
relatively high.
2. Small source of heat (i.e. aquarium heater,) mini-headphones and a
playback device. Low cost to the attacker.
Paul
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul D. Robertson "My statements in this message are personal opinions
paul@compuwar.net which may have no basis whatsoever in fact."
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: Adam Shostack: "Re: [fw-wiz] Biometrics"
- In reply to: Foley, Denys: "[fw-wiz] Biometrics"
- Next in thread: Adrian Grigorof: "Re: [fw-wiz] Biometrics"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|