RE: [fw-wiz] Username password VS hardware token plus PIN

• Previous message: ArkanoiD: "Re: [fw-wiz] Username password VS hardware token plus PIN"
• Maybe in reply to: MHawkins_at_TULLIB.COM: "[fw-wiz] Username password VS hardware token plus PIN"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

To: ark@eltex.net, dr@kyx.net
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 11:08:46 -0500

This is off topic but does anyone know of the method to run code on the
REXX.

I have one of 'em too and it always seemed a crying shame to not be able to
reprogram it to do something useful.

-----Original Message-----
From: ArkanoiD [mailto:ark@eltex.net]
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 10:37 AM
To: Dragos Ruiu
Cc: Marcus J. Ranum; Frank Knobbe; Hawkins, Michael;
firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
Subject: Re: [fw-wiz] Username password VS hardware token plus PIN

nuqneH,

Rex is z80-based and easy programmable (though 8bit and slow)

On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 07:13:25PM -0800, Dragos Ruiu wrote:
>
> On February 23, 2005 05:18 pm, you wrote:
> > Dragos Ruiu wrote:
> > >The problem with the old PDA idea is user reluctance.
> >
> > Then get SecurIDs or whatever for the few users who
> > insist on 'em. But there are PDAs that are tiny, too -
> > credit card size like the Oregon Scientific PDA293
> > ($9.95 at officedepot.com) or Xircom's Rex, which needs
> > no cradle because it fits in a PCMCIA slot to sync
> > and recharge...
>
> Heh, being a gadgetaholic, I own a Rex... (which was not
> amongst my most stellar purchases btw, or long-lived in
> terms of use, though it was small enough in its pcmcia
> form factor that it rattled around in my suitcase for
> years before i noticed it and threw it in the dinosaur
> equipment pile with the newtons and many other
> strange oddball devices). I don't know anything
> about the Oregon Scientific device, but the Rex
> is a non starter. First killer is the frighteningly limited
> input system, and second is the high level of reverse
> engineering needed to retrofit anything onto that
> device as it has nothing resembling a programmatic
> interface or any user accessible code bits. It's only
> marginally more useful than a paper printout of your
> contacts, though the batteries don't die on paper. :-)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------
The information contained in this email is confidential and may also contain
privileged information. Sender does not waive confidentiality or legal
privilege. If you are not the intended recipient please notify the sender
immediately; you should not retain this message or disclose its content to
anyone.
Internet communications are not secure or error free and the sender does not
accept any liability for the content of the email. Although emails are
routinely screened for viruses, the sender does not accept responsibility
for any damage caused. Replies to this email may be monitored.
For more information about the Collins Stewart Tullett group of companies
please visit the following web site: www.cstplc.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------

_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards

• Previous message: ArkanoiD: "Re: [fw-wiz] Username password VS hardware token plus PIN"
• Maybe in reply to: MHawkins_at_TULLIB.COM: "[fw-wiz] Username password VS hardware token plus PIN"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]