Re: [fw-wiz] Username password VS hardware token plus PIN
From: John Hall (jhall_at_ptavvs.net)
Date: 02/24/05
- Previous message: Paul D. Robertson: "Re: [fw-wiz] Username password VS hardware token plus PIN"
- In reply to: Dragos Ruiu: "Re: [fw-wiz] Username password VS hardware token plus PIN"
- Next in thread: David Lang: "Re: [fw-wiz] Username password VS hardware token plus PIN"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: Dragos Ruiu <dr@kyx.net> Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 18:54:54 -0800
In my experience every senior manager has either a PDA, pager, cellphone,
or Blackberry already. We just need to make a secure token a required
component for all of those devices. The first company that gets their
token into any two of the above devices in wide distribution is going
to be rich.
cheers,
JMH
Dragos Ruiu wrote:
> Response to Standard Ranum rant:
>
> The problem with the old PDA idea is user reluctance.
> Sure it gets over the cost issue, but convincing some
> technophobe senior manager to carry around a small
> commercial token is hard enough. Making him/her lug
> around an old electronic brick, associated case and
> chargers, will be even more of an uphill task. And I would
> bet that pointing out that it can play tetris will do little
> to sell it further in those cases. :-)
>
...
> cheers,
> --dr
>
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: Paul D. Robertson: "Re: [fw-wiz] Username password VS hardware token plus PIN"
- In reply to: Dragos Ruiu: "Re: [fw-wiz] Username password VS hardware token plus PIN"
- Next in thread: David Lang: "Re: [fw-wiz] Username password VS hardware token plus PIN"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|