Re: [fw-wiz] Username password VS hardware token plus PIN
From: Frank Knobbe (frank_at_knobbe.us)
Date: 02/22/05
- Previous message: Paul D. Robertson: "Re: [fw-wiz] Username password VS hardware token plus PIN"
- Maybe in reply to: MHawkins_at_TULLIB.COM: "[fw-wiz] Username password VS hardware token plus PIN"
- Next in thread: Marcus J. Ranum: "Re: [fw-wiz] Username password VS hardware token plus PIN"
- Reply: Marcus J. Ranum: "Re: [fw-wiz] Username password VS hardware token plus PIN"
- Reply: Adam Shostack: "Re: [fw-wiz] Username password VS hardware token plus PIN"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: "Marcus J. Ranum" <mjr@ranum.com> Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:01:30 -0600
On Tue, 2005-02-22 at 12:56 -0500, Marcus J. Ranum wrote:
> #include <sys/rant/ranum/2978378.h>
>
> :) But anyhow....
>
> What amazes me is that organizations seem to think that having
> authentication tokens is a) expensive and b) hard.
Agreed :)
My "token" consists of a Java OTP calculator running on my Nokia 9500. A
hardware device with OTP thingy. And a remote site can even SMS me a
one-time-code onto the phone which I can use for login. Try *that* with
a standard keyfob token! ;)
Cheers,
Frank
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- application/pgp-signature attachment: This is a digitally signed message part
- Previous message: Paul D. Robertson: "Re: [fw-wiz] Username password VS hardware token plus PIN"
- Maybe in reply to: MHawkins_at_TULLIB.COM: "[fw-wiz] Username password VS hardware token plus PIN"
- Next in thread: Marcus J. Ranum: "Re: [fw-wiz] Username password VS hardware token plus PIN"
- Reply: Marcus J. Ranum: "Re: [fw-wiz] Username password VS hardware token plus PIN"
- Reply: Adam Shostack: "Re: [fw-wiz] Username password VS hardware token plus PIN"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]