Re: [fw-wiz] Application-level Attacks
From: Danny (nocmonkey_at_gmail.com)
Date: 01/28/05
- Previous message: Joseph S D Yao: "Re: [fw-wiz] Multiple firewalls from different manufactureres"
- In reply to: Crispin Cowan: "[fw-wiz] Application-level Attacks"
- Next in thread: Crispin Cowan: "Re: [fw-wiz] Application-level Attacks"
- Reply: Crispin Cowan: "Re: [fw-wiz] Application-level Attacks"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: Crispin Cowan <crispin@immunix.com> Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 11:11:16 -0500
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 18:56:58 -0800, Crispin Cowan <crispin@immunix.com> wrote:
> Shimon Silberschlag wrote:
>
> > Today, when attacks are shifting towards using the already open ports
> > on the firewall, at the application level,
>
> It is often said that contemporary attacks are migrating to
> application-level attacks. Can someone point me to data backing this claim?
How do you define contemporary attacks? All attacks except for those
at the application-level?
...D
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: Joseph S D Yao: "Re: [fw-wiz] Multiple firewalls from different manufactureres"
- In reply to: Crispin Cowan: "[fw-wiz] Application-level Attacks"
- Next in thread: Crispin Cowan: "Re: [fw-wiz] Application-level Attacks"
- Reply: Crispin Cowan: "Re: [fw-wiz] Application-level Attacks"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|