Re: [fw-wiz] Application-level Attacks
From: Devdas Bhagat (devdas_at_dvb.homelinux.org)
Date: 01/28/05
- Previous message: Behm, Jeffrey L.: "RE: [fw-wiz] Multiple firewalls from different manufactureres"
- In reply to: Crispin Cowan: "[fw-wiz] Application-level Attacks"
- Next in thread: Adam Shostack: "Re: [fw-wiz] Application-level Attacks"
- Reply: Adam Shostack: "Re: [fw-wiz] Application-level Attacks"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 21:24:12 +0530
On 27/01/05 18:56 -0800, Crispin Cowan wrote:
> Shimon Silberschlag wrote:
>
> > Today, when attacks are shifting towards using the already open ports
> > on the firewall, at the application level,
>
> It is often said that contemporary attacks are migrating to
> application-level attacks. Can someone point me to data backing this claim?
Or the reverse, data showing that older attacks were not application
layer attacks (packet flooding and the rare ping of death attact excepted).
Devdas Bhagat
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: Behm, Jeffrey L.: "RE: [fw-wiz] Multiple firewalls from different manufactureres"
- In reply to: Crispin Cowan: "[fw-wiz] Application-level Attacks"
- Next in thread: Adam Shostack: "Re: [fw-wiz] Application-level Attacks"
- Reply: Adam Shostack: "Re: [fw-wiz] Application-level Attacks"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|