Re: [fw-wiz] Multiple firewalls from different manufactureres
From: Paul D. Robertson (paul_at_compuwar.net)
Date: 01/28/05
- Previous message: Paul D. Robertson: "RE: [fw-wiz] Multiple firewalls from different manufactureres"
- In reply to: Shimon Silberschlag: "Re: [fw-wiz] Multiple firewalls from different manufactureres"
- Next in thread: MHawkins_at_TULLIB.COM: "RE: [fw-wiz] Multiple firewalls from different manufactureres"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: Shimon Silberschlag <shimons@bll.co.il> Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 09:30:10 -0500 (EST)
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005, Shimon Silberschlag wrote:
> Paul,
>
> I was more aiming to the issue of having the FW made by different
> manufacturers. There is a lot to be gained from having a common platform
> that the admins are familiar with, the chances for human errors are reduced,
> to say the least.
That was the basis of my "single layer of failure" comment, and why I
wouldn't buy a firewall from my router vendor- I *want* different code.
If your technical stall can't handle two firewall products, it's time to
trade out the staff, not the products.
> And yes, I too advocate the use of a screening router in front of the
> external FW. The question is, do I *have* to get a different brand FW for
> the internal one? And if the answer is yes, what's the reasoning?
We'll still have failures in things like VPNs, IPv6 will probably have all
the vendors doing all the old stupid stuff and some new stupid stuff, if
you're using authentication, that tends to be tricky, etc.
> Do you see "head-on" attacks on the fw (trying to get to the fw in spite of
> a stealth rule defined) as a viable/sizeable threat today?
It's never been just about the firewall, transport layer and state engine
bugs have happened in the past, let's not even talk about the folks who
think IPS on the firewall is a rocking good thing and the parsing
issues and update of the month stuff that happens there.
I like having one statefull thing outside, and one proxy inside- and I like
a router between the inside users and the inside firewall too. Less
chance for bad stuff to happen either from the inside or the outside.
Paul
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul D. Robertson "My statements in this message are personal opinions
paul@compuwar.net which may have no basis whatsoever in fact."
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: Paul D. Robertson: "RE: [fw-wiz] Multiple firewalls from different manufactureres"
- In reply to: Shimon Silberschlag: "Re: [fw-wiz] Multiple firewalls from different manufactureres"
- Next in thread: MHawkins_at_TULLIB.COM: "RE: [fw-wiz] Multiple firewalls from different manufactureres"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
