Re: [fw-wiz] Defense in Depth to the Desktop

From: David Lang (david.lang_at_digitalinsight.com)
Date: 12/25/04

  • Next message: Mark: "Re: [fw-wiz] How to Secure Windows? was How to Save the World"
    To: Chris Pugrud <cpugrud@yahoo.com>
    Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2004 03:01:59 -0800 (PST)
    
    

    On Thu, 2 Dec 2004, Chris Pugrud wrote:

    >
    > Consider the following example of a simplified network. The network is divided
    > into two subnets; one subnet contains all of the client systems, while the
    > second subnet contains all of the servers. The client subnet and the server
    > subnet are separated by a session based, stateful, packet filtering firewall.
    > The firewall is unidirectional; it only permits traffic that is initiated from
    > a client to a server. Servers are allowed to reply to clients, but they can
    > not initiate communication, TCP or UDP, to a client.
    >
    > Surprisingly, this example does not break Microsoft or most application [*1]
    > protocols. The result is counterintuitive, but analysis and testing support
    > this assertion.
    <SNIP>
    > Questions? (aka, what have I missed?)

    One thing that will be a problem with this is the new trend for windows
    sysadmins to use RDP to administer the desktops. you can set up additional
    firewall rules to do this, but each exception to the policy complicates
    things as well as making them less secure.

    David Lang

    -- 
    There are two ways of constructing a software design. One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies. And the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies.
      -- C.A.R. Hoare
    _______________________________________________
    firewall-wizards mailing list
    firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
    http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
    

  • Next message: Mark: "Re: [fw-wiz] How to Secure Windows? was How to Save the World"

    Relevant Pages

    • RE: Secure Network Design (DMZ, LAN, etc)
      ... you'll see that their both on the same subnet. ... It has a port for the trusted network and a port ... Our firewall handles NAT. ... > servers, wouldn't it require a public IP and therefore be somewhat ...
      (Security-Basics)
    • Re: Questions on Site Boundaries
      ... Our servers are on seperate server only subnets. ... > Hang on - it sounds like there is a separate server subnet and a separate ... > client subnet. ... So I don't think overlapping boundaries will be a huge ...
      (microsoft.public.sms.setup)
    • Re: Cant Connect to Win2008 Server from 1 of several subnets
      ... As the firewall has a Static Route for the 10.254.0.36 Subnet that points to the default router that I changed the machine with the issues to. ... One of the reasons I like to have my Servers DHCP with Reservations... ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.networking)
    • RE: SBS client updates over WAN remote sites
      ... User Wizard for the remote users on the SBS 2003 server, ... client applications such as Internet Explorer 6.0, Microsoft Office Outlook ... You can apply the following software on the subnet 10.0.2.0 using Group ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
    • Re: Quick FRS question
      ... You define a subnet, create a site ... You can see if a client is obtaining/ ascertaining the correct site ... None of the DFS roots get heavy use, no more then 10 people at a time, it's just that they are connected by very slow lines. ... it is called 'Net> Mask Ordering' in the DNS options. ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.active_directory)