Re: [fw-wiz] ASP/Hosting Architecture
From: Jian Zhen (jlz_at_zhen.org)
Date: 11/22/04
- Previous message: Rob Hughes: "Re: [fw-wiz] Checkpoint NAT H.323 support"
- In reply to: Chris Pugrud: "Re: [fw-wiz] ASP/Hosting Architecture"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: Chris Pugrud <chris@pugrud.net> Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 20:28:33 -0800
Chris Pugrud (chris@pugrud.net) [041118 13:16]:
> The customer conenctions were encrypted because they left our zone of control,
> even though they were "private" point to point t1 lines. The IPSEC VPN's were
> done with Network Alchemy Hardware. Network Alchemy was aquired by Nokia and I
> hope the capabilities have been maintained. NA has a really phenominal
> automagical load balancing capabilty. I still have several boxes on my shelf
> that I purchased from the company.
Unfortunately, Network Alchemy's hardware, assuming you are talking about
the CryptClusters, has been EOL'ed for quite a while now.
My previous work place had a couple hundred of them and I thought they were
one of the best VPN devices out there, probably still is.
It's unfortunate that they are no longer available.
However, I believe some of the functionalities were incoprated into their
IPSO software/appliances.
-- Jian Zhen <jlz@zhen.org> Blog: http://www.trustpath.com/logmatters _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: Rob Hughes: "Re: [fw-wiz] Checkpoint NAT H.323 support"
- In reply to: Chris Pugrud: "Re: [fw-wiz] ASP/Hosting Architecture"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]