RE: [fw-wiz] Re: Ethics, morality and the industry
From: Jim Seymour (jseymour_at_linxnet.com)
Date: 11/07/04
- Previous message: Mark Teicher: "RE: [fw-wiz] Re: Ethics, morality and the industry"
- In reply to: Bill Royds: "RE: [fw-wiz] Re: Ethics, morality and the industry"
- Next in thread: David Lang: "RE: [fw-wiz] Re: Ethics, morality and the industry"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2004 11:10:43 -0500 (EST)
"Bill Royds" <broyds@rogers.com> wrote:
>
> One of the problems that giving such publicity to so many criminal
> "ex-hackers" is that it makes it much more difficult for honest
> security practitioners to do our job.
[snip]
In more ways that one, I should expect. For example: Where's the
down-side in engaging in such criminal behaviour? I execute a few (?)
high-profile cracks, become known as an Evil Genius, get arrested
(maybe not in that order), go to prison for a couple years or so, get
out, have a ready-made lucrative career in public speaking or security
consulting?
Speaking of security consulting: What kind of customer would hire a
security consulting firm that knowingly employed (ex-)criminals?
I understand the attraction of employing such people. What I don't
understand is the "thinking" behind actually doing so. I suspect it
has nothing whatsoever to do with improving a security company's
capabilities.
Jim
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: Mark Teicher: "RE: [fw-wiz] Re: Ethics, morality and the industry"
- In reply to: Bill Royds: "RE: [fw-wiz] Re: Ethics, morality and the industry"
- Next in thread: David Lang: "RE: [fw-wiz] Re: Ethics, morality and the industry"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|