Re: [fw-wiz] Securing a wireless network

From: Morrow (morrow.long_at_yale.edu)
Date: 10/31/04

  • Next message: Paul D. Robertson: "Re: [fw-wiz] IPv6 and firewall policies?"
    To: firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com, Mark D Robinson <mrobinso@fpkc.com>, chris@compucounts.com, Tony Rall <trall@almaden.ibm.com>
    Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 21:45:09 -0400
    
    

    The Internet2 Salsa document draft you cited is a fantastic resource.

    In addition to the network access control systems sold commercially it
    references:

            Bradford Campus Manager
            Perfigo (now acquired by Cisco)

    there are also many systems sold specifically for securing wireless
    networks
    (usually adding 802.1X for authentication and/or web-based auth, an
    agent including an EAP 'supplicant' can also act as a host-based scanner
    agent, patch checker, firewall/IDS, etc.). If you are a more recent
    wireless
    vendor with a security solution and I've left you out please forgive
    me...

            Aruba www.arubanetworks.com
            BlueSocket www.bluesocket.com
            Cranite Systems http://www.cranite.com/
            Ecutel www.ecutel.com
            Fortress Tech http://www.fortresstech.com/
            ReefEdge www.reefedge.com
            Vernier www.vernier.com

    Harvard Medical School and the Boston Public Library have used
    BlueSocket.

    A number of other institutions have used the other commercial solutions
    above.

    An article (that is now a bit dated) covers the subject from Network
    World Dec 02:
            http://www.nwfusion.com/news/2002/1202earlywlan.html

    Many Universities have 'rolled' their own quaruntine/isolation systems
    by
    using a combination of integrating public domain and commercial systems
    for:

    * mandatory network registration (NetReg -- the Southwest or a variant )

    * DHCP servers

    * VLANs and/or RFC1918 subnets

    * network vulnerability assessment scanners (Nessus or NASL modules)

    * Windows host-based security assessment agents (home-built or
    commercial)
            to check patch management and the existence/operation of A/V, S/W F/W,
            HIDS, policies, etc.

    * Routers using ACLs (Access Control Lists), Firewalls or IPSes to
    limit access off
            the wireless network

    * 'NoCatAuth' captive web portals -- redirection servers to 'capture'
    the captive systems
            web browser sessions and put up pages explaining why the PC is
    isolated, how to get
            out of quaruntine (via patching, sanitization, downloading/installing
    an agent
            program, registering the PC, etc.) as well as providing A/V software,
    worm removal
            tools & patch downloads (e.g. MS SUS/WUS servers).

    Many Universities and colleges use such systems to attempt to control
    the masses of
    residential (dorm) student PCs connecting to their campus networks
    (initially these network
    access control systems were for wired networks and now are also used
    for authenticating &
    screening PCs before allowing them access from wireless network
    connections).

    H. Morrow Long, CISSP, CISM
    Director - Information Security Office
    Yale University, ITS

    On Oct 29, 2004, at 10:12 PM, Mark D Robinson wrote:
    > You might try looking through the list archives. I vaguely remember a
    > discussion about a custom system that was set up on a university
    > network to
    > enforce up-to-date security settings (patch level, AV updates, etc.)
    > before
    > the host was given access. Unfortunately, I don't remember any
    > specifics
    > right this minute, but I do remember being pretty impressed from the
    > description. I think that some or all of the software was freely
    > available.
    > It was probably last year or early this year. Someone else on the list
    > may
    > remember more.
    >
    > This might also help:
    > "Strategies for Automating Network Policy Enforcement"
    > er
    >
    > HTH
    >
    >
    > Mark Robinson
    > IT Manager
    > Frilot, Partridge, Kohnke & Clements, L.C.
    >
    >
    > -----Original Message-----
    > ...
    > A few other relevant solutions have been suggested, but they're all
    > retail. I was actually expecting more of the 'free unix' approach;
    > maybe I've been on Full-Disclosure for too long ;).
    > ...
    >
    > -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    > ----
    > The information in this electronic message may be privileged and
    > confidential and is intended for the use of the individual(s) or
    > entity(ies) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you
    > are on
    > notice that any unauthorized disclosure, copying, distribution, or
    > taking
    > of any action in reliance on the contents of these electronically
    > transmitted materials is prohibited.
    > -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    > ----
    >
    >
    > _______________________________________________
    > firewall-wizards mailing list
    > firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
    > http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards

    _______________________________________________
    firewall-wizards mailing list
    firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
    http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards


  • Next message: Paul D. Robertson: "Re: [fw-wiz] IPv6 and firewall policies?"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: XP to Win98 network failure
      ... >Windows 98 IP Configuration ... the XP machine could see the workgroup and itself within ... >"Unable to browse the network." ... The network settings are configured for user-level access control, ...
      (microsoft.public.windowsxp.network_web)
    • Re: [Full-disclosure] MS05-039 spreading was: AV Reaction Times of the latest MS05-039-based Worm
      ... Organizations that used some kind of NPAR technology to cut the network ... We routinely cut our networks into 4000 zones, ... adopt the attitude of "Windows cannot be made safe, ... It is an Access control problem. ...
      (Full-Disclosure)
    • Re: security products
      ... Securing files on a single machine with access control and/or ... encryption is one thing but, the data reaching to its user through ... password protected would flow in clear text through the network. ... look to the master, ...
      (Security-Basics)
    • Re: Cant save Word 2008 on Network Drive
      ... OS 10.5 uses Access Control Lists to manage user privileges. ... The cleanest fix is to set up ACLs for your users. ... edit and save .doc on the network. ... John McGhie, Microsoft MVP, Word and Word:Mac ...
      (microsoft.public.mac.office.word)
    • SecurityFocus Microsoft Newsletter #50
      ... Subject: SecurityFocus Microsoft Newsletter #50 ... Specialist in Microsoft's Security Services Partner Program, ... Network Monitoring for Intrusion Detection ... Relevant URL: ...
      (Focus-Microsoft)