Re: [fw-wiz] Securing a wireless network
From: Jason Lewis (jlewis_at_packetnexus.com)
Date: 10/31/04
- Previous message: \: "Re: [fw-wiz] Re: Ethics, morality and the industry"
- In reply to: Mark D Robinson: "Re: [fw-wiz] Securing a wireless network"
- Next in thread: Morrow: "Re: [fw-wiz] Securing a wireless network"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: Mark D Robinson <mrobinso@fpkc.com> Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 20:56:13 -0400
Sounds like NetReg. http://www.netreg.org/
I think someone had a modification that could scan a machine and if it
didn't have a patch it would be moved to a vlan that only had access to
patches for installtion.
I may be confusing two different things.....
jas
Mark D Robinson wrote:
> You might try looking through the list archives. I vaguely remember a
> discussion about a custom system that was set up on a university network to
> enforce up-to-date security settings (patch level, AV updates, etc.) before
> the host was given access. Unfortunately, I don't remember any specifics
> right this minute, but I do remember being pretty impressed from the
> description. I think that some or all of the software was freely available.
> It was probably last year or early this year. Someone else on the list may
> remember more.
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: \: "Re: [fw-wiz] Re: Ethics, morality and the industry"
- In reply to: Mark D Robinson: "Re: [fw-wiz] Securing a wireless network"
- Next in thread: Morrow: "Re: [fw-wiz] Securing a wireless network"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]