Re: [fw-wiz] Securing a wireless network

From: Michael H (af_pilot33_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 10/29/04

  • Next message: Pete Lindstrom: "RE: [fw-wiz] Re: Ethics, morality, and mental retardation"
    To: firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
    Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 12:33:51 -0700
    
    

    This is essentially what we are doing. We have the WAP in a DMZ (on an
    OpenBSD fw) that only allows the MS ports to VPN to our network. Users
    authenticate witih their same Windows account and any scripts you want to
    run are part of our standard log in scripts.

    >From: Claudiu Dragalina-Paraipan <dr.clau@gmail.com>
    >Reply-To: Claudiu Dragalina-Paraipan <dr.clau@gmail.com>
    >To: firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
    >Subject: Re: [fw-wiz] Securing a wireless network
    >Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 09:41:51 +0200
    >
    >Hi,
    >
    >you could use VPNs. What I would do is this:
    >- set a VPN server, my choice would be FreeBSD or OpenBSD, for what I
    >think that are obvious reasons;
    >- on the client side, which I assume uses Windows, you can use the VPN
    >client that comes with Windows (2000, XP), or get one for older
    >version from Internet;
    >- back to the server, you should NAT/pass only IPs that come through
    >the VPNs, while the other http traffic can be redirected to an
    >instruction page.
    >
    >This way you have almost what you want. You still can use DHCP to give
    >IPs to new clients, but allow only connections to Internet from IPs
    >used for VPNs. If you put your networks servers behind this "vpn
    >server", you can filter connections to them also.
    >
    >This is not exactly what you want, but is far more secure then what
    >you have already.
    >Probably you can make a general user for VPNs, thus you don't have to
    >provide everyone with a user and password.
    >
    >I hope this helps you.
    >
    >Best regards,
    > Claudiu.
    >
    >
    >On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 20:14:05 -0400, chris@compucounts.com
    ><chris@compucounts.com> wrote:
    > > At my so-called place of business, there exists a completely insecure
    >public wireless network that I wish to lock down (ignoring WEP, Radius, and
    >other wireless security methods).
    > >
    > > I am looking for a means of forcing 'unverified' clients (by MAC
    >address?; not at all worried about spoofing) to run a script or program of
    >some sort before being able to interface with other network devices (to
    >scan for viruses, check software configuration, and whatever else). The
    >best bet at the moment seems to include VLAN's and some sort of destination
    >NAT to a generic web server that says "hey, run this!", but I'm having
    >trouble finding literature on the subject. Partly because I'm not entirely
    >sure what I'm looking for.
    > >
    > > The general idea:
    > > - unknown client connects to network and obtains IP from DHCP
    > > - client opens web browser, and is redirected to some generic page with
    >instructions
    > > - client follows instructions, runs script
    > > - <slightly hazy with a chance of rain>
    > > - client is assigned new [IP|VLAN|something else] and is able to connect
    >to the rest of the network
    > >
    > > Currently, the network (entirely Cisco) is setup as follows:
    > >
    > > - Backbone: Cisco Catalyst 6509 multilayer switch
    > > - Closets: various models of manged Catalyst switches running an
    >enterprise IOS version
    > > - Access Points: Cisco Aironet AP350's and 1120's
    > >
    > > Can anyone point me in some direction or offer a different solution? My
    >idea is not to authenticate clients and reject unknown users; the idea is
    >to force users to have semi-secured computers while maintaining an
    >otherwise open network.
    > >
    > > I would prefer a solution that requires the least amount of changes to
    >the backbone switch (because all requests regarding it have to be forwarded
    >to dept. A, which sends it to B, then C, and yadda yadda yadda; 5 years
    >later, it *might* get done), but I'm open to any possibilities.
    > >
    > > Thanks in advance,
    > >
    > > - Chris Carlson
    > >
    > > นนนนนนนบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบบน
    > > * "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they
    > > fight you, then you win." ~Mahatma Ghandi
    > >
    > > _______________________________________________
    > > firewall-wizards mailing list
    > > firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
    > > http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
    > >
    >
    >
    >--
    >Claudiu Dragalina-Paraipan
    >e-mail: dr.clau@gmail.com
    >_______________________________________________
    >firewall-wizards mailing list
    >firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
    >http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards

    _______________________________________________
    firewall-wizards mailing list
    firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
    http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards


  • Next message: Pete Lindstrom: "RE: [fw-wiz] Re: Ethics, morality, and mental retardation"