Re: [fw-wiz] The Mathematics of Relative Security
From: Mark Tinberg (mtinberg_at_securepipe.com)
Date: 09/26/04
- Previous message: Crispin Cowan: "Re: [fw-wiz] The Mathematics of Relative Security"
- In reply to: Chris Pugrud: "Re: [fw-wiz] The Mathematics of Relative Security"
- Next in thread: R. DuFresne: "Re: [fw-wiz] The Mathematics of Relative Security"
- Reply: R. DuFresne: "Re: [fw-wiz] The Mathematics of Relative Security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: Chris Pugrud <chris@pugrud.net> Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 18:03:14 -0500 (CDT)
On Tue, 21 Sep 2004, Chris Pugrud wrote:
> TCP also introduces a wrinkle that is not easily covered by the set theory I
> have learned, or I'm missing something - the concept of one-way membership. If
I may wish to point out at this point that TCP connections are generally
bidirectional. A may only be able to initiate to B, but once that
connection is established B can send potentially malicious data back to A.
See vulnerabilities in web client software for an example of this
practice.
-- Mark Tinberg SecurePipe, Inc. _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: Crispin Cowan: "Re: [fw-wiz] The Mathematics of Relative Security"
- In reply to: Chris Pugrud: "Re: [fw-wiz] The Mathematics of Relative Security"
- Next in thread: R. DuFresne: "Re: [fw-wiz] The Mathematics of Relative Security"
- Reply: R. DuFresne: "Re: [fw-wiz] The Mathematics of Relative Security"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]