Re: [fw-wiz] SMTP security server open relay question

From: Luca Berra (bluca_at_comedia.it)
Date: 07/22/04

  • Next message: Luca Berra: "Re: [fw-wiz] Port 37628....Is it just another port or out of the extra ordinary???"
    To: firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
    Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 08:26:51 +0200
    
    

    On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 09:34:08AM -0400, Matt Ritenburg wrote:
    >Hello,
    >
    >I modified our SMTP security server with a "*@.mydomain.com" in the
    >recipient field of the match tab, however, it does not seem to make a
    >difference. The security server still issues a 250 response to any
    >recipient regardless of destination domain. The resource is included in
    >the rule base and is used for the same rule that catches SMTP traffic and
    >sends it to our CVP server. The policy has been saved and pushed. I dunno
    >what else to check?
    >
    drop that piece of junk.
    use a serious smtp server facing the internet and have it forward all
    mail to an antivirus that speaks either smtp or lmtp.
    i only had nightmares with fw1 smtp server and its poor queue handling.

    L.

    -- 
    Luca Berra -- bluca@comedia.it
            Communication Media & Services S.r.l.
     /"\
     \ /     ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN
      X        AGAINST HTML MAIL
     / \
    _______________________________________________
    firewall-wizards mailing list
    firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
    http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
    

  • Next message: Luca Berra: "Re: [fw-wiz] Port 37628....Is it just another port or out of the extra ordinary???"