Re: [fw-wiz] Firewall routing thought...

From: Dana Nowell (DanaNowell_at_cornerstonesoftware.com)
Date: 07/08/04

  • Next message: Gwendolynn ferch Elydyr: "Re: [fw-wiz] Firewall routing thought..."
    To: eric@mweb.com, gwen@reptiles.org
    Date: Thu, 08 Jul 2004 16:48:06 -0400
    
    

    Aaahhhh, if they are on the same subnet, why is the gateway involved at
    all? Last time I checked, 10.1.1.1 (assume mask 255.255.255.0) talked
    directly to 10.1.1.2, no gateway in the middle. There is an automagic
    'static route' that says 10.1.1.x is local to the segment.

    On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 13:50:18 -0400 (EDT) Gwendolynn ferch Elydyr penned:
    >On Fri, 2 Jul 2004, Eric Appelboom wrote:
    >> If one has firewall A with external ip on the same subnet as firewall B.
    >> How common is the practice of adding static routes on firewall A for The
    >> networks protected by firewall B and the other way round.
    >>
    >> Would this technique not lower the latency or overheads of not having the
    >> packets en route from firewall A to firewall B being sent to its default
    >> gateway to then be processed by the router and sent to firewall B. Thus the
    >> traffic would be direct A<-->B
    >
    >I think you're a bit confused about how routing/routers work, and what
    >the relative "costs" are.
    >
    >Your network layout isn't really clear from your email, but as soon as
    >you make a change in broadcast domains, the router is going to be involved.
    >
    >> Besides being a tad messy would it be considered and at what traffic rate?
    >
    >Well - I generally wouldn't consider it at any traffic rate.
    >
    >First of all, it's not likely to improve your latency or overhead. The
    >packets are still going to be seen by the router.
    >
    >Secondly, you've now added complexity to your network in the form of a
    >bunch of static routes in different places, all of which need to be
    >maintained - and almost certainly won't be, until some changes breaks
    >things.
    >
    >"a tad messy" is almost always a signal to run away screaming. That's
    >code for "unmaintainable" and "all-nighters".
    >
    >Ranting briefly, a good design should be clear and easy to understand
    >and explain. If you find yourself handwaving, or muttering quickly to
    >get past some point in your design [or adding in "here be dragons"],
    >you should stop and figure out why.

    -- 
    Dana Nowell     Cornerstone Software Inc.
    Voice: 603-595-7480 Fax: 603-882-7313
    email: DanaNowell_at_CornerstoneSoftware.com
    _______________________________________________
    firewall-wizards mailing list
    firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
    http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
    

  • Next message: Gwendolynn ferch Elydyr: "Re: [fw-wiz] Firewall routing thought..."

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: queer dns access problem
      ... on your subnet, but when it comes time to get out of your subnet it ... The following is why I don't think its a firewall issue. ... If by the same segment, you mean within the same 10.1.5.x domain, I ... Pinged the default gateway. ...
      (RedHat)
    • Re: Another Secure FTP thread -- Protection Levels
      ... gateway or proxy system to act as an FTP relay ... firewall) to the remote system. ... He would need to establish his FTP ... connections from the gateway to the remote system while blocking FTP ...
      (comp.protocols.kermit.misc)
    • Re: Another Secure FTP thread -- Protection Levels
      ... through your firewall that is not authorized. ... FTP either restrict what commands can be sent or logging each command ... gateway or proxy system to act as an FTP relay ... between his system and the remote system. ...
      (comp.protocols.kermit.misc)
    • Re: Routing and Remote Access - Please Help
      ... when it got to the firewall, where would it go?, no where. ... It makes sense that the gateway 192.168.2.1 won't exist to the ... my gateway for clients on subnet A are ... that subnet and ISA firewall. ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.networking)
    • Re: Another Secure FTP thread -- Protection Levels
      ... gateway or proxy system to act as an FTP relay ... between his system and the remote system. ... There would then be two FTP ... firewall) to the remote system. ...
      (comp.protocols.kermit.misc)