[fw-wiz] Firewall routing thought...
From: Eric Appelboom (eric_at_mweb.com)
Date: 07/02/04
- Previous message: Melson, Paul: "RE: [fw-wiz] PIX with Public DMZ"
- Next in thread: Gwendolynn ferch Elydyr: "Re: [fw-wiz] Firewall routing thought..."
- Reply: Gwendolynn ferch Elydyr: "Re: [fw-wiz] Firewall routing thought..."
- Maybe reply: Dana Nowell: "Re: [fw-wiz] Firewall routing thought..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: <firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com> Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 16:22:56 +0200
Hi,
This question is wrt traffic routing between two firewalls and improving
efficiency.
If one has firewall A with external ip on the same subnet as firewall B.
How common is the practice of adding static routes on firewall A for The
networks protected by firewall B and the other way round.
Would this technique not lower the latency or overheads of not having the
packets en route from firewall A to firewall B being sent to its default
gateway to then be processed by the router and sent to firewall B. Thus the
traffic would be direct A<-->B
Besides being a tad messy would it be considered and at what traffic rate?
Regards
Eric
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- application/x-pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
- Previous message: Melson, Paul: "RE: [fw-wiz] PIX with Public DMZ"
- Next in thread: Gwendolynn ferch Elydyr: "Re: [fw-wiz] Firewall routing thought..."
- Reply: Gwendolynn ferch Elydyr: "Re: [fw-wiz] Firewall routing thought..."
- Maybe reply: Dana Nowell: "Re: [fw-wiz] Firewall routing thought..."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|