Re: [fw-wiz] Sun/Solaris Checkpoint FW-1 Question
mlh_at_zipworld.com.au
Date: 07/02/04
- Previous message: Paul Matuszewski: "[fw-wiz] Pix to pix VPN with Static.. Seems possible.. Is it?"
- Next in thread: Paul Armstrong: "Re: [fw-wiz] Sun/Solaris Checkpoint FW-1 Question"
- Maybe reply: Paul Armstrong: "Re: [fw-wiz] Sun/Solaris Checkpoint FW-1 Question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: Alex Bihlmaier <thalunil@kallisti.de> Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 16:59:30 +1000
On Sun, Jun 27, 2004 at 01:13:20PM +0200, Alex Bihlmaier wrote:
>
> Marcus J. Ranum wrote:
> |>One of my customers is using the Checkpoint FW-1 Firewall and has a
> |>relativly large ruleset. (large as in large for just typing it down)
> |
> | You realize that's a bad sign for more than just operational
> | reasons, right?
>
> No, i don't realize.
> The former IT Administration made bad work.
>
> Or what do you mean? ;)
He means that all your applications should be
recoded to use SOAP over http. That will massively
simplify your firewall rules.
Matt
PS. :-)
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: Paul Matuszewski: "[fw-wiz] Pix to pix VPN with Static.. Seems possible.. Is it?"
- Next in thread: Paul Armstrong: "Re: [fw-wiz] Sun/Solaris Checkpoint FW-1 Question"
- Maybe reply: Paul Armstrong: "Re: [fw-wiz] Sun/Solaris Checkpoint FW-1 Question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
