Re: [fw-wiz] Firewalls Compared
From: Marcus J. Ranum (mjr_at_ranum.com)
Date: 06/28/04
- Previous message: ArkanoiD: "Re: [fw-wiz] Firewalls Compared"
- In reply to: ArkanoiD: "Re: [fw-wiz] Firewalls Compared"
- Next in thread: Eugene Kuznetsov: "RE: [fw-wiz] Firewalls Compared"
- Reply: Eugene Kuznetsov: "RE: [fw-wiz] Firewalls Compared"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: ark@eltex.net, Laura Taylor <ltaylor@relevanttechnologies.com> Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 14:56:19 -0400
ArkanoiD wrote:
>I've found that articles
>are written from "packet filter" point of view, paying almost no
>attention to application protocol support
With the increasing focus on application layer attacks, the day
of packet-filters even being termed "firewalls" is pretty much over.
Packet filters were barely firewalls to begin with, but today, the
fight's mostly up in Layer 7 where they have no value.
Of course "we told you so" applies. ;)
mjr.
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: ArkanoiD: "Re: [fw-wiz] Firewalls Compared"
- In reply to: ArkanoiD: "Re: [fw-wiz] Firewalls Compared"
- Next in thread: Eugene Kuznetsov: "RE: [fw-wiz] Firewalls Compared"
- Reply: Eugene Kuznetsov: "RE: [fw-wiz] Firewalls Compared"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]