Re: [fw-wiz] Sun/Solaris Checkpoint FW-1 Question
From: Alex Bihlmaier (thalunil_at_kallisti.de)
Date: 06/27/04
- Previous message: Laura Taylor: "RE: [fw-wiz] Firewalls Compared"
- In reply to: Marcus J. Ranum: "Re: [fw-wiz] Sun/Solaris Checkpoint FW-1 Question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: "Marcus J. Ranum" <mjr@ranum.com> Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 13:13:20 +0200
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Marcus J. Ranum wrote:
|>One of my customers is using the Checkpoint FW-1 Firewall and has a
|>relativly large ruleset. (large as in large for just typing it down)
|
|
|
| You realize that's a bad sign for more than just operational
| reasons, right?
No, i don't realize.
The former IT Administration made bad work.
Or what do you mean? ;)
//thalunil
- --
Use PGP to encrypt/sign your eMail.
Get my public key at:
http://www.kallisti.de/users/thalunil/public_key.asc
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFA3qvPZRXhGxCXApsRAoZjAKDLHl5KHVr3BBY2o6zvFIXs/bxrYgCfQdZY
vdvvbJiLBSiQLT3H7VwekAw=
=GkVD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: Laura Taylor: "RE: [fw-wiz] Firewalls Compared"
- In reply to: Marcus J. Ranum: "Re: [fw-wiz] Sun/Solaris Checkpoint FW-1 Question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
