Re: [fw-wiz] Firewalls Compared

From: Ryan M. Ferris (rferris_at_rmfdevelopment.com)
Date: 06/22/04

  • Next message: Paul D. Robertson: "Re: [fw-wiz] Firewalls Compared" 
    To: Dave Piscitello <yodave@hargray.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 09:18:24 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time)

    Good comments on reviewing firewalls...However, at this point I am
    convinced that personal and home network firewalls and desktop anti-viral
    software for Windows are the most critical components of national if not corporate security.
    All of the most devastating attacks (worms, viruses, DOS, e-mail
    attachments, terrorist attacks) of the last 2 - 4 years leverage the mass
    of unguarded PCs. Traditional concepts of firewalling networks ultimately
    seemed useless and incomplete to guard against these type of attacks.

    I don't know where I would find statistics on how many home or corporate
    broadband networks have hardware firewalls or personal firewalls. If I had to
    guess for home users...I would say less than 10% have hardware firewalls
    and less than 20% employ personal firewalls. Fewer would employ both
    together Most users I know just ride bareback against a cable modem or
    DSL which is relatively amazing considering that GIAC trained
    professionals now are recommending that home users consider both hardware
    and software firewalls simultaneously. (See something like
    http://www.giac.org/practical/GSEC/Barbara_Kupiec_GSEC.pdf). Considering
    the number of intrusions that I see break throught my hardware firewall
    and get stopped by my personal firewall...I would say this is excellent if
    not underwhelming advice.

    Amazingly, even as a professional I find all the application protection
    options of Zone Alarm Plus worth some serious study. I can't imagine most
    home users working their way through the when and how of granting (or not
    granting) generic host process access to an "open process".
    Other personal firewalls I have worked with approach the problem with
    greatly varying interfaces and functionality. Some are really quite
    disastrous to install or work with or just plain uninformative for the
    desk top.

    There are a few sites around that offer personal firewall reviews and
    comparisons...but they are cursory in nature. In truth, the personal
    firewall industry is unstandardized and rapidly evolving - a fascinating
    state given the probability that home firewalls with soon eclipse
    corporate firewalls as the most significant component of national computer
    security.

    Ryan M. Ferris
    rferris@rmfdevelopment.com
    rferris@rmfnetworksecurity.com

    On Mon, 21 Jun 2004, Dave Piscitello wrote:

    > Paul, good list (I'd love to have your permission to publish it at
    > LOOP.interop.com, with your attribution, of course). I would add:
    >
    > 11. What methods does the firewall provide to assist me in
    > asserting my security policy is enforced: specifically, are
    > the log entries generated sufficiently detailed?
    > 12. Perhaps included in your thinking regarding upgrade path,
    > but authentication rather than performance-focused: does the
    > firewall support all present and projected auth methods; if
    > PKI, who's certs?
    >
    > I'd also add related checks if you intend to use
    > an IPsec VPN for remote access
    > - origin of client SW (who wrote it),
    > - availability of non-Windows clients (if appropriate),
    > - reliability/track record of client SW vis-a-vis install across
    > different Win OS and hardware
    > - suitability of client for use with other firewalls (if multi-
    > organizational collaborative/B2B/B2C is something you must satisfy)
    > - client policy administration/enforcement method
    > I know this goes beyond "just a firewall" so if O/T ignore.
    >
    >
    > At 11:47 AM 6/21/2004 -0400, Paul D. Robertson wrote:
    >> 1. How well do the boxes implement my proposed security policy.
    >> 2. Do they pass testing for implementing my security policy.
    >> 3. How do the boxes perform implementing my security policy[1.]
    >> 4. What is my upgrade path should my performance requirements change?
    >> 5. How well can the devices be administered by multiple levels of
    >> people if my security policy defines and requires such.
    >> 6. Historically, how well has the vendor done.
    >> 7. What does it take to make them fall over. If you can't make them fall
    >> over, you're not testing hard enough.
    >> 8. How intuitive is my security policy when added to the systems.
    >> 9. Failover/backup issues (test both.).
    >> 10. License issues (how do they handle license failure, and how long
    >> does it take to recover.)
    >
    >
    > _______________________________________________
    > firewall-wizards mailing list
    > firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
    > http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
    >
    >
    _______________________________________________
    firewall-wizards mailing list
    firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
    http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards

  • Next message: Paul D. Robertson: "Re: [fw-wiz] Firewalls Compared"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Hardware firewalls
      ... > Id just like to clarify a few points about hardware firewalls. ... > security vendors in order to provide added security functionality over and ... > Hardware appliances were not able to distinguish between good and "bad" ...
      (comp.security.firewalls)
    • RE: [Full-Disclosure] Zone Alarm
      ... hardware firewalls those devices that have hit the market in full the past ... that the Netgear model is about twice as much as the typical ... Software firewalls are not a security solution ...
      (Full-Disclosure)
    • [fw-wiz] ISP firewalling of residential customers - was - About Port Forwarding, Apache and Firewall
      ... > firewalls, and kept there. ... to protect our customers (absence of funds and man-power always figure ... policy on my residential networks. ... The big issue from a business standpoint is that popular opinion seems to ...
      (Firewall-Wizards)
    • Re: First new figure skating results coverage
      ... >> those using hardware firewalls cannot. ... > compatable with WebExPc. ... You might get past hardware firewalls, but you would never get past my ...
      (comp.security.firewalls)
    • Re: Unexplained wan/lan activity
      ... >> firewalls and networks and such. ... A little while ago I noticed wan activity going on, ... > windows try a packet ...
      (comp.security.firewalls)