Re: [fw-wiz] Web server security?

From: Steffen Kluge (kluge_at_fujitsu.com.au)
Date: 06/22/04

  • Next message: strider_at_mailworks.org: "Re: [fw-wiz] Exchange & Blackberry"
    To: firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
    Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 11:01:52 +1000
    
    
    

    On Tue, 2004-06-22 at 08:33, Paul D. Robertson wrote:
    > Has anyone on the list played with RSBAC (preferably) or SELinux and
    > Apache Web servers, and has any configurations they can share? I think
    > I'm more interested in MAC compartments than RBAC, but if someone else has
    > done the major groundwork, I'd like to have a head start.

    Quite a bit of the SELinux groundwork done so far has made it into
    Fedora Core 2, apparently. I eagerly went to check it out when it was
    released.

    Upon further delving into the matter, I found that the SELinux community
    reckons they're adding value mainly in situations where you run various
    different services on a single machine. They seem to think SELinux is
    probably not worthwhile for "single-trick ponies", since its main
    purpose is to isolate unrelated subsystems from each other (such as
    keeping a hacked web server from messing with IMAP accounts).

    I tend to set up my Internet exposed servers to run exactly one service
    (plus SSH, not exposed to the outside world), and strip them down
    accordingly. I concluded that SELinux isn't going to be worth the
    trouble in these cases.

    If you are concerned about web-only servers you might end up reaching
    the same conclusion.

    Cheers
    Steffen.

    
    

    _______________________________________________
    firewall-wizards mailing list
    firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
    http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards



  • Next message: strider_at_mailworks.org: "Re: [fw-wiz] Exchange & Blackberry"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: syscall: sys_promote
      ... you can use selinux to create a policy ... In this way, it's that the web servers themselves drop the privileges, ... while selinux or sudo is for the next launching process. ... AFAIK setrlimitcan't be used to change resource limits ...
      (Linux-Kernel)
    • Re: Why do I need SELinux?
      ... I was discussing about the NEED of SELinux for everyone ... > I think I am probably a typical home user, ... > who I assume are not running web servers accessible by the world. ... There's so many different ways you can have your security break - to ...
      (Fedora)