RE: [fw-wiz] Re: Firewalls Compared

From: Christopher Lee (
Date: 06/21/04

  • Next message: Dave Piscitello: "Re: [fw-wiz] Firewalls Compared"
    To: <>
    Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 14:32:57 -0400

    Joel did a good job in that article, especially taking into consideration
    the differences on every product does its "application layer inspection".
    At the same time, I don't think Joel took into consideration that some of
    the products evaluated in his article (such as Check Point) leverages a
    subscription-based signature update service to stay on top of the latest
    "popular" threats.

    Since you are looking at Check Point in this case. Do refer to the
    following URL on Check Point's official public info in this particular



    -----Original Message-----
    [] On Behalf Of Norman Zhang
    Sent: June 21, 2004 2:16 PM
    Subject: [fw-wiz] Re: Firewalls Compared

    kashif wrote:
    > I want to compare two firewall ( Technical Aspects ) only PIX Vs
    > has anybody done anything similar or could point out "what aspects" do we
    > need to compare.

    Back in March 2004, Information Security Magazine published some
    comparisons between the two. Perhaps the following URL is helpful to you.,295796,sid6_iss346_art662,00.html


    firewall-wizards mailing list

    firewall-wizards mailing list

  • Next message: Dave Piscitello: "Re: [fw-wiz] Firewalls Compared"