Re: [fw-wiz] Certification ?
From: Bennett Todd (bet_at_rahul.net)
Date: 06/19/04
- Previous message: Dave Piscitello: "Re: Certification (was Re:[fw-wiz] Vulnerability Response)"
- In reply to: Paul D. Robertson: "Re: [fw-wiz] Certification ?"
- Next in thread: Brad Barkett: "Re: [fw-wiz] Certification ?"
- Reply: Brad Barkett: "Re: [fw-wiz] Certification ?"
- Reply: Bennett Todd: "Re: [fw-wiz] Certification ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: "Paul D. Robertson" <paul@compuwar.net> Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 15:47:11 +0000
2004-06-18T22:25:15 Paul D. Robertson:
> I still think we're mostly in a "if you need the cert, it's
> because you haven't done the deeds" mode [...]
Can't agree more. And this reminds me of another touchstone; besides
certifications, if someone uses the phrase "best practices" in
discussion of computer security they can be safely disregarded.
-Bennett
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
- Previous message: Dave Piscitello: "Re: Certification (was Re:[fw-wiz] Vulnerability Response)"
- In reply to: Paul D. Robertson: "Re: [fw-wiz] Certification ?"
- Next in thread: Brad Barkett: "Re: [fw-wiz] Certification ?"
- Reply: Brad Barkett: "Re: [fw-wiz] Certification ?"
- Reply: Bennett Todd: "Re: [fw-wiz] Certification ?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|