[fw-wiz] Re: Putting MS servers behind firewalls (Dilan Walgampaya)
From: Tim Chettle (tim.chettle_at_orange.net)
Date: 06/08/04
- Previous message: Kelly, Chris W.: "RE: [fw-wiz] Putting MS servers behind firewalls"
- In reply to: Mark: "[fw-wiz] Putting MS servers behind firewalls (Dilan Walgampaya)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: "Mark" <firewalladmin@bellsouth.net> Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 10:41:58 +0100
well if you are using the http connections there is no requirement to have
Domian controllers externally facing as the http server issues the challenge
response and passes your credentails to the Domain controller.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark" <firewalladmin@bellsouth.net>
To: "Tim Chettle" <tim.chettle@orange.net>
Cc: <firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com>
Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 11:01 PM
Subject: Putting MS servers behind firewalls (Dilan Walgampaya)
> Hey, that is a good point, I like it. What about the Domain Controller
> though? I assume that is what is meant by "AD Server".
>
> Mark
>
> > However the point i was going to make was that rather than open up that
high
> > number of connections, if you are using exchange 2003 and outlook 2003
you
> > can replicate over https and if you deploy a sharepoint services on the
box
> > again you can browse using https
>
> =================================================================
>
> > > Hi Wizards,
> > >
> > > I ran in to a problem putting Microsoft Servers behind a firewall. The
> > > users has to go through the FW to access the servers. The servers I
> > > wanted to put are on an AD domain. There were AD server, File server
and
> > > an Exchange server. These servers need a large no. of services opened
> > > for proper operation. The worse is that exchange server work in a
> > > dynamic port setup where the server opens a random port for each
> > > different client. MS site has some registry edits that is supposed to
> > > correct this dynamic port setup issue. But when I tried these they did
> > > not work as per the document describes.
> > >
> > > Has anybody done this kind of a setup (with other than an ISA server).
> > > I am interested in doing this with Netscreen/Pix and Linux IPTables.
Any
> > > help is appreciated.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance
> > >
> > > Dilan
> > >
> > >
> > > --__--__--
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > firewall-wizards mailing list
> > > firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
> > > http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
> > >
> > >
> > > End of firewall-wizards Digest
> >
> >
> > ---
> > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> > Version: 6.0.698 / Virus Database: 455 - Release Date: 02/06/2004
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > firewall-wizards mailing list
> > firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
> > http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
>
--- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.698 / Virus Database: 455 - Release Date: 03/06/2004 _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: Kelly, Chris W.: "RE: [fw-wiz] Putting MS servers behind firewalls"
- In reply to: Mark: "[fw-wiz] Putting MS servers behind firewalls (Dilan Walgampaya)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|