Re: [fw-wiz] Worms, Air Gaps and Responsibility
From: Erick Mechler (emechler_at_techometer.net)
Date: 05/10/04
- Previous message: Adam Shostack: "Re: [fw-wiz] Worms, Air Gaps and Responsibility"
- In reply to: Paul D. Robertson: "Re: [fw-wiz] Worms, Air Gaps and Responsibility"
- Next in thread: Paul D. Robertson: "Re: [fw-wiz] Worms, Air Gaps and Responsibility"
- Reply: Paul D. Robertson: "Re: [fw-wiz] Worms, Air Gaps and Responsibility"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: "Paul D. Robertson" <paul@compuwar.net> Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 12:03:00 -0700
:: > I bet you'd see the same sort of behavior from worms no matter what OS the
:: > World's critical infrastructures were to run. If they ran *NIX, you'd see
:: > more worms targeting those OSs. There's something to be said for
:: > heterogenous computing environments.
::
:: Funnily enough, I don't recall a Cisco IOS worm with any traction...
Last time I checked, it's also not considered a server/desktop platform :)
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: Adam Shostack: "Re: [fw-wiz] Worms, Air Gaps and Responsibility"
- In reply to: Paul D. Robertson: "Re: [fw-wiz] Worms, Air Gaps and Responsibility"
- Next in thread: Paul D. Robertson: "Re: [fw-wiz] Worms, Air Gaps and Responsibility"
- Reply: Paul D. Robertson: "Re: [fw-wiz] Worms, Air Gaps and Responsibility"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|