Re: [fw-wiz] Worms, Air Gaps and Responsibility
From: Erick Mechler (emechler_at_techometer.net)
Date: 05/10/04
- Previous message: Mark Gumennik: "RE: [fw-wiz] Worms, Air Gaps and Responsibility"
- In reply to: Devdas Bhagat: "Re: [fw-wiz] Worms, Air Gaps and Responsibility"
- Next in thread: Paul D. Robertson: "Re: [fw-wiz] Worms, Air Gaps and Responsibility"
- Reply: Paul D. Robertson: "Re: [fw-wiz] Worms, Air Gaps and Responsibility"
- Reply: Devdas Bhagat: "Re: [fw-wiz] Worms, Air Gaps and Responsibility"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 11:12:43 -0700
:: > AND: where do you get the info about LINUX being more secure than the
:: > Big Bad ? Read any serious info , like from bagtrack, LINUX had more
:: > vulnerabilities for the past 3 years than any given MS OS
:: None of which really impacted the world. Or took down critical
:: infrastructure, that being what sparked off this thread.
I bet you'd see the same sort of behavior from worms no matter what OS the
World's critical infrastructures were to run. If they ran *NIX, you'd see
more worms targeting those OSs. There's something to be said for
heterogenous computing environments.
Cheers - Erick
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: Mark Gumennik: "RE: [fw-wiz] Worms, Air Gaps and Responsibility"
- In reply to: Devdas Bhagat: "Re: [fw-wiz] Worms, Air Gaps and Responsibility"
- Next in thread: Paul D. Robertson: "Re: [fw-wiz] Worms, Air Gaps and Responsibility"
- Reply: Paul D. Robertson: "Re: [fw-wiz] Worms, Air Gaps and Responsibility"
- Reply: Devdas Bhagat: "Re: [fw-wiz] Worms, Air Gaps and Responsibility"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]