Re: [fw-wiz] Worms, Air Gaps and Responsibility
From: Paul D. Robertson (paul_at_compuwar.net)
Date: 05/07/04
- Previous message: Victor Williams: "RE: [fw-wiz] PIX Firewall, Help with nemask use in NAT and Global comands"
- In reply to: Gwendolynn ferch Elydyr: "Re: [fw-wiz] Worms, Air Gaps and Responsibility"
- Next in thread: Bennett Todd: "Re: [fw-wiz] Worms, Air Gaps and Responsibility"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: Gwendolynn ferch Elydyr <gwen@reptiles.org> Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 10:41:00 -0400 (EDT)
On Fri, 7 May 2004, Gwendolynn ferch Elydyr wrote:
> Y'know... there was something to be said for uucp... ;>
Indeed, there still is- I was going to put something about mail grabbed
from inside via UUCP, but decided it'd over-complicate the message.
I've always thought it would be better to do mail from a DMZ machine via
UUCP- but I've never done it, since I tend to trust my hardened mail
servers enough to talk to the Internet at large.
Paul
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paul D. Robertson "My statements in this message are personal opinions
paul@compuwar.net which may have no basis whatsoever in fact."
probertson@trusecure.com Director of Risk Assessment TruSecure Corporation
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: Victor Williams: "RE: [fw-wiz] PIX Firewall, Help with nemask use in NAT and Global comands"
- In reply to: Gwendolynn ferch Elydyr: "Re: [fw-wiz] Worms, Air Gaps and Responsibility"
- Next in thread: Bennett Todd: "Re: [fw-wiz] Worms, Air Gaps and Responsibility"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]