RE: [fw-wiz] Worms, Air Gaps and Responsibility
From: Marcus J. Ranum (mjr_at_ranum.com)
Date: 05/07/04
- Previous message: Marcus J. Ranum: "Re: [fw-wiz] Worms, Air Gaps and Responsibility"
- In reply to: Carson Gaspar: "RE: [fw-wiz] Worms, Air Gaps and Responsibility"
- Next in thread: Crispin Cowan: "Re: [fw-wiz] Worms, Air Gaps and Responsibility"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: Carson Gaspar <carson@taltos.org>, firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 18:45:37 -0400
Carson Gaspar wrote:
>I agree. My response was to you're "what excuse do they have" question. In my specific industry, they have a bunch.
I think those excuses are predicated on an implicit business assumption
that security is not cost-justified. But businesses are being conditioned
(thanks to all the "security researchers" out there...) to be aware that
security is a problem. So - since it's not cost-justified BUT they know
they should do something about it: they produce excuses instead.
mjr.
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: Marcus J. Ranum: "Re: [fw-wiz] Worms, Air Gaps and Responsibility"
- In reply to: Carson Gaspar: "RE: [fw-wiz] Worms, Air Gaps and Responsibility"
- Next in thread: Crispin Cowan: "Re: [fw-wiz] Worms, Air Gaps and Responsibility"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|
