Re: [fw-wiz] Stanford break in
From: Luca Berra (bluca_at_comedia.it)
Date: 04/23/04
- Previous message: Stewart, John: "RE: [fw-wiz] Stanford break in"
- In reply to: R. DuFresne: "Re: [fw-wiz] Stanford break in"
- Next in thread: Chuck Vose: "Re: [fw-wiz] Stanford break in"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 19:05:01 +0200
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 01:10:59PM -0400, R. DuFresne wrote:
>>
>> Network synced passwords are the only way to manage a large number of
>> users. If you have 10 workstations and 1 server, it might be fine to have
>> no network directory, but with 300,000 users, I would say it's impossible.
>> I would consider: LDAP, NDS, AD, SecureID, RADIUS, TACACS. (notice the
>> conspicuous absence of NIS, and I wanted to leave out AD, but it seems to
>> be unavoidable these days.
>>
>
>
>HP made this usless, unless they have finally enabled a shadow setup in
>new versions of the OS. We played the single sing-on game at nortel, and
for 11.11
http://software.hp.com/portal/swdepot/displayProductInfo.do?productNumber=ShadowPassword
included in later releases
--
Luca Berra -- bluca@comedia.it
Communication Media & Services S.r.l.
/"\
\ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN
X AGAINST HTML MAIL
/ \
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: Stewart, John: "RE: [fw-wiz] Stanford break in"
- In reply to: R. DuFresne: "Re: [fw-wiz] Stanford break in"
- Next in thread: Chuck Vose: "Re: [fw-wiz] Stanford break in"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]