Re: [fw-wiz] Stanford break in
From: Chuck Vose (vosechu_at_roman-fleuve.com)
Date: 04/22/04
- Previous message: Chuck Vose: "Re: [fw-wiz] Stanford break in"
- In reply to: Paul D. Robertson: "Re: [fw-wiz] Stanford break in"
- Next in thread: Richard.Bertolett_at_ci.austin.tx.us: "RE: [fw-wiz] Stanford break in"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: "Paul D. Robertson" <paul@compuwar.net> Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 10:48:38 -0700
> IMO, NIS should have been drug out and shot years ago...
I'm beginning to understand why.
> > I know that this is 3 disparate topics, would list etiquette suggest
> > that I should make 3 topics?
>
> Nah, the moderator would have bounced it if he'd thought it wasn't ok ;)
Didn't realize this was moderated, right on.
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: Chuck Vose: "Re: [fw-wiz] Stanford break in"
- In reply to: Paul D. Robertson: "Re: [fw-wiz] Stanford break in"
- Next in thread: Richard.Bertolett_at_ci.austin.tx.us: "RE: [fw-wiz] Stanford break in"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|