RE: [fw-wiz] Seeking input: Research Proposal: "Is a third position possible?"
From: Ben Nagy (ben_at_iagu.net)
Date: 03/23/04
- Previous message: Crissup, John (MBNP is): "RE: [fw-wiz] (no subject)"
- In reply to: Paul D. Robertson: "Re: [fw-wiz] Seeking input: Research Proposal: "Is a third position possible?""
- Next in thread: Crispin Cowan: "Re: [fw-wiz] Seeking input: Research Proposal: "Is a third position possible?""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: <firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 16:33:39 +0100
> -----Original Message-----
> From: firewall-wizards-admin@honor.icsalabs.com
> [mailto:firewall-wizards-admin@honor.icsalabs.com] On Behalf
> Of Paul D. Robertson
> Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2004 2:45 AM
> To: Holt, Philip
> Cc: firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
> Subject: Re: [fw-wiz] Seeking input: Research Proposal: "Is a
> third position possible?"
>
> On Sat, 20 Mar 2004, Holt, Philip wrote:
> > "Is a third position
> > possible?"
>
> More than three positions are certainly possible, the real
> question is are they supportable?
I think the _real_ question is..."WTF?"
> > We are all aware of CISSP's Canons.
>
> It would appear that not all CISSPs are "aware" of the
> canons
Well I got one recently (got bored) and I don't recall any secret
initiations or elk lodges. As I recall it went something like "Don't be an
idiot, don't do illegal or unprofessional stuff and don't diss the CISSP".
That hardly qualifies as "canon" IMO, and I find the term (with its
religious overtones) quite...troubling.
> > We are also all aware of the positions put forth and the beliefs
> > held fast to of the 2600 Group, Hacktivismo, John Perry Barlow's
> > "Declaration of Cyberspace" and a host of other similar
> positions and
> > beliefs that are in fact counter-positions to those revealed in
> > CISSP's Canon.
OK. Why don't you explain what _you_ think the conflicting CISSP and 2600 /
Hacktivismo positions are, and then we can play ball.
> I don't hold a CISSP[2], but I fully support their canons and
> indeed they match my ethics quite well.
(Paul likes Big Endian footnotes, apparently. :)
> >(building
> > of course on Edmund Husserl's "The Crisis of European Sciences and
> > Humanity and Transcendental Phenomenology")
I think you're going to have to set out the basics of transcendental
philosophy in general versus the empirical sciences here before you get any
meaningful feedback. It's stretching a _lot_ to assume a grounding in this
stuff for respondants.
A quick precis on how the _FSCK_ you think this impacts network security
would be for bonus points.
Let me put it a different way. I think you might have more luck with making
your request understandable to everyone if you tried to phrase it in terms
we non-academic mortals might understand and leave out the abstract
philosophy.
Cheers,
ben
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: Crissup, John (MBNP is): "RE: [fw-wiz] (no subject)"
- In reply to: Paul D. Robertson: "Re: [fw-wiz] Seeking input: Research Proposal: "Is a third position possible?""
- Next in thread: Crispin Cowan: "Re: [fw-wiz] Seeking input: Research Proposal: "Is a third position possible?""
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|