[fw-wiz] Re: PIX syslog WAS: (no subject)
From: Carson Gaspar (carson_at_taltos.org)
Date: 03/24/04
- Previous message: Joshua M. Jones: "RE: [fw-wiz] (no subject)"
- In reply to: Paul D. Robertson: "Re: [fw-wiz] (no subject)"
- Next in thread: Robert L. Wanamaker: "RE: [fw-wiz] (no subject)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 18:16:49 -0500
--On Tuesday, March 23, 2004 08:48:56 -0500 "Paul D. Robertson"
<paul@compuwar.net> wrote:
> Any syslog server will work, it's a standard protocol. I prefer
> minirsyslogd on Linux boxes.
Not _quite_ true. Cisco supports a proprietary syslog over TCP
implementation on the PIX (as well as standard, lossy, UDP syslog).
syslog-ng (under unix-like OSes) supports the TCP format. According to
google, so does the Kiwi syslog daemon for Win32 (recommended by several
other people on this list), as well as the Cisco PIX Firewall Syslog Server
(PFSS).
-- Carson _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: Joshua M. Jones: "RE: [fw-wiz] (no subject)"
- In reply to: Paul D. Robertson: "Re: [fw-wiz] (no subject)"
- Next in thread: Robert L. Wanamaker: "RE: [fw-wiz] (no subject)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|