Re: [fw-wiz] Evolution of Firewalls
From: ArkanoiD (ark_at_eltex.ru)
Date: 03/15/04
- Previous message: Kyle King: "[fw-wiz] Cisco PiX 501 running 6.2 - Defying me for no reason"
- In reply to: Marcus J. Ranum: "Re: [fw-wiz] Evolution of Firewalls"
- Next in thread: Marcus J. Ranum: "Re: [fw-wiz] Evolution of Firewalls"
- Reply: Marcus J. Ranum: "Re: [fw-wiz] Evolution of Firewalls"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: "Marcus J. Ranum" <mjr@ranum.com> Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 14:37:00 +0300
nuqneH,
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 12:04:16AM -0500, Marcus J. Ranum wrote:
> Another BIG value of proxies is that they can implement only subsets
> of a protocol.
Slightly OT, anyone aware of WHICH protocol subset do email clients
use when doing IMAP4? I am still planning to implement a proxy, and RFC
requires all servers to support the whole fscking pile of s**t!
(still tring to imagine that terrible brain damage that may lead
protocol designers to such an idiotic requirement)
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: Kyle King: "[fw-wiz] Cisco PiX 501 running 6.2 - Defying me for no reason"
- In reply to: Marcus J. Ranum: "Re: [fw-wiz] Evolution of Firewalls"
- Next in thread: Marcus J. Ranum: "Re: [fw-wiz] Evolution of Firewalls"
- Reply: Marcus J. Ranum: "Re: [fw-wiz] Evolution of Firewalls"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|