Re: [fw-wiz] Evolution of Firewalls
From: Christian Kreibich (christian_at_whoop.org)
Date: 03/10/04
- Previous message: Frederick M Avolio: "Re: [fw-wiz] Evolution of Firewalls"
- In reply to: Dave Piscitello: "Re: [fw-wiz] Evolution of Firewalls"
- Next in thread: ArkanoiD: "Re: [fw-wiz] Evolution of Firewalls"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: Firewall Wizards <firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com> Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 23:10:19 +0000
On Tue, 2004-03-09 at 18:26, Dave Piscitello wrote:
>
> Emphasis on "functionality" not implementation, and "inspect all things
> that ought to have their own port # but are now tunneled through port
> 80"(primarily, not exclusively). May the "don't proliferate port number
> assignment" gods forgive what I suggest here but I honestly don't think we
> make life any easier by creating one gaping hole than several dozen
> possibly containable ones.
I recall a thread on this list in which the majority seemed to agree
with this. It's from about a year ago (wow, I think I'm officially a
long-time lurker now :) and also contains a nice discussion of the pros
and cons of smoking:
http://honor.icsalabs.com/pipermail/firewall-wizards/2003-April/014339.html
Cheers,
Christian.
--
________________________________________________________________________
http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~cpk25
http://www.whoop.org
_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: Frederick M Avolio: "Re: [fw-wiz] Evolution of Firewalls"
- In reply to: Dave Piscitello: "Re: [fw-wiz] Evolution of Firewalls"
- Next in thread: ArkanoiD: "Re: [fw-wiz] Evolution of Firewalls"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Relevant Pages
|