RE: [fw-wiz] Strange setup

From: Sloane, David (DSloane_at_vfa.com)
Date: 02/27/04

  • Next message: Christopher Lee: "RE: IPS (was: [fw-wiz] Sources for Extranet Designs?)"
    To: <firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com>
    Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 13:54:20 -0500
    
    

    Not having seen the configuration, it's hard to say. It's possible that
    the netscreen won't accept traffic from non-server IP addresses - that
    would help.

    -David

    -----Original Message-----
    From: firewall-wizards-admin@honor.icsalabs.com
    [mailto:firewall-wizards-admin@honor.icsalabs.com] On Behalf Of
    mcary@badgermeter.com
    Sent: February 27, 2004 12:17 PM
    To: firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
    Subject: RE: [fw-wiz] Strange setup

    What prevents a user from changing his default route from ISA to the FW,
    bypassing any authentication that ISA provided?

    -----Original Message-----
    From: firewall-wizards-admin@honor.icsalabs.com
    [mailto:firewall-wizards-admin@honor.icsalabs.com]On Behalf Of Bill
    Royds
    Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 7:02 PM
    To: 'Melson, Paul'; 'franco segna'; firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
    Subject: RE: [fw-wiz] Strange setup

    Actually there is a good reason for the ISA to be configured this way.
    The ISA server acts as an HTTP cache/authenticator. So if you have the
    inside boxes with default route going to internal address of ISA server,
    it can validate the user of that workstation with Windows authentication
    and either, forward the request out to the Internet and cache the reply
    , or return the cached value. This adds to security by ensuring that all
    internal workstation access is by authenticated users. The straight
    through branch is used for server traffic like mail that is coming
    towards the internal network or is being forwarded by authorized MTA
    style servers that use the FW as default route.

    ISA may not be a great firewall but it is a good proxy/authenticator for
    a Windows network. Its examination it does of HTTP traffic before
    caching it is a bonus.

    -----Original Message-----
    From: firewall-wizards-admin@honor.icsalabs.com
    [mailto:firewall-wizards-admin@honor.icsalabs.com] On Behalf Of Melson,
    Paul
    Sent: February 26, 2004 2:24 PM
    To: franco segna; firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
    Subject: RE: [fw-wiz] Strange setup

    Franco,

    Without seeing the rule sets on either system, it is impossible to say.

    Clearly this design misses the point of a 'DMZ' network. There's no
    reason that I can think of for the ISA server to be dual-homed. There's
    no reason that outbound proxy traffic, RAS/VPN traffic, or reverse proxy
    traffic can't pass through two sets of firewall rules, one between the
    outside and DMZ, and another between the DMZ and inside. If you're
    tasked with redesigning this network, that should be first on your to-do
    list.

    That said, a possible explanation is that the ISA server is a reverse
    proxy for servers on the internal network, and the firewall only allows
    inbound traffic to the DMZ for NAT purposes. In this situation, the ISA
    server could provide extra access controls at the application layer in
    the form of authentication or restricting access to specific
    pages/services through destination lists. Workstation browsing and
    other inside->out traffic could pass directly through the firewall
    without going through ISA.

    That's just a theory, though. Looking at the rules on both the
    SonicWall and the ISA Server will give you a better idea of the intended
    function of this design.

    PaulM

    PS - I can't help but notice that a disproportionately large number of
    European, and specifically German IP networks (including my previous
    employer's) have been designed using internal addressing schemes that do
    not conform to RFC1918. Anybody have an educated guess as to why this
    is? It's just a personal curiosity of mine.

    > -----Original Message-----
    > Hi everybody,
    > I'm being confronted with the following existing setup:
    >
    >
    > T1 --------------------------------
    > (Internet | LAN backbone |
    > and VPNs) ------------+---+---+-+-+-+-+---
    > | | | | | | | |
    > | +-------+ local x.x.x.254/24 | | | | | | +-
    > | | Sonic +---------------------+ | | | | +-
    > +--+ Wall | | | | |
    > | Pro +------+ | | | +- SQL
    > +-------+ dmz | | | +-- mail
    > (?) | +--------+ | +--- etc.
    > | | MS ISA | |
    > +--+ 2000 +------+
    > | Server | x.x.x.251/24
    > +--------+
    >
    > The public web server is hosted elsewhere. The LAN comprises
    > 30 workstations.
    > To complicate the matter, the LAN address family x.x.x. is
    > NOT RFC1918-compliant (and is conflicting with existing
    > Internet hosts).
    > The system is up and running, but I cannot understand the
    > bypassing of the ISA server through the direct connection
    > firewall/LAN. And the meaning of DMZ seems to be lost.
    > Anyone can help me to understand the matter ? Thanks in advance
    _______________________________________________
    firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
    http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards

    _______________________________________________
    firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
    http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards

    The information contained in this message is confidential and is
    intended for the addressee(s) only. If you have received this message
    in error or there are any problems please notify the originator
    immediately. The unauthorized use, disclosure, copying or alteration of
    this message is strictly forbidden. Badger Meter, Inc. will not be
    liable for direct, special, indirect or consequential damages arising
    from alteration of the contents of this message by a third party or as a
    result of any virus being passed on.

    _______________________________________________
    firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
    http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
    _______________________________________________
    firewall-wizards mailing list
    firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
    http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards


  • Next message: Christopher Lee: "RE: IPS (was: [fw-wiz] Sources for Extranet Designs?)"

    Relevant Pages

    • Re: Internet Intermittent Connection
      ... Internal Network: 192.168.100.1 - 192.168.100.255 ... any other networks and remove any additional ranges if they are added. ... "ISA Server detected a proxy chain loop. ... I have an intermittent Internet connection that has been going on ...
      (microsoft.public.isa)
    • Re: ISA Server 2004 and Application Events 14147
      ... This newsgroup only focuses on SBS technical issues. ... | any Internet access restriction from either the server or the internal ... |> Server computer is different from the ISA Server configuration. ... and add your internal network adapter. ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
    • RE: ISA Server lost domain
      ... 172.16.18.131 is my External Network. ... Domian from the ISA server. ... adapter configuration for ISA server: ... >Intranet & the second one is used for internet, ...
      (microsoft.public.isaserver)
    • Re: Eventid 15108... spoof address ????
      ... clicked this and the 169 address appeared just after an IP on the network. ... > 2) Extract all files to a folder on ISA server ... > 'Microsoft Firewall' service. ... > |> server could receive some spoof attacks from the internet. ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)
    • Re: Internet Intermittent Connection
      ... First of all double check the "Internal" Network and make ... Second, double check the ISA server routing table, make sure that all routes ... make sure that if your DSL modem is NATting to the internet that ... The Physical Connection: ...
      (microsoft.public.isa)