Re: [fw-wiz] Re: IPS
From: Gary Flynn (flynngn_at_jmu.edu)
Date: 02/27/04
- Previous message: Bill Royds: "RE: [fw-wiz] Strange setup"
- In reply to: David Thiel: "Re: [fw-wiz] Re: IPS"
- Next in thread: Ben Nagy: "RE: IPS (was: [fw-wiz] Sources for Extranet Designs?)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
To: firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 21:12:31 -0500
David Thiel wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 06:45:53PM -0500, Gary Flynn wrote:
>
>>I got sick of watching Snort reports tell me about things that
>>could have been easily been blocked with an inline device.
>
>
> Then why not use Snort inline?
Thought about it. It wasn't available when I first started
looking and nobody could point me to someone using Hogwash
inline on a production network. You know anyone that has
Snort Inline in place on a production 45 Mbps Internet
link?
Also, the commercial products have more finished reporting/
administration interfaces.
-- Gary Flynn Security Engineer - Technical Services James Madison University _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
- Previous message: Bill Royds: "RE: [fw-wiz] Strange setup"
- In reply to: David Thiel: "Re: [fw-wiz] Re: IPS"
- Next in thread: Ben Nagy: "RE: IPS (was: [fw-wiz] Sources for Extranet Designs?)"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]