RE: [fw-wiz] Strange setup

From: Melson, Paul (PMelson_at_sequoianet.com)
Date: 02/26/04

  • Next message: Mark Tinberg: "Re: [fw-wiz] Strange setup"
    To: "franco segna" <fsegna@web.de>, <firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com>
    Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 14:24:02 -0500
    
    

    Franco,

    Without seeing the rule sets on either system, it is impossible to say.

    Clearly this design misses the point of a 'DMZ' network. There's no
    reason that I can think of for the ISA server to be dual-homed. There's
    no reason that outbound proxy traffic, RAS/VPN traffic, or reverse proxy
    traffic can't pass through two sets of firewall rules, one between the
    outside and DMZ, and another between the DMZ and inside. If you're
    tasked with redesigning this network, that should be first on your to-do
    list.

    That said, a possible explanation is that the ISA server is a reverse
    proxy for servers on the internal network, and the firewall only allows
    inbound traffic to the DMZ for NAT purposes. In this situation, the ISA
    server could provide extra access controls at the application layer in
    the form of authentication or restricting access to specific
    pages/services through destination lists. Workstation browsing and
    other inside->out traffic could pass directly through the firewall
    without going through ISA.

    That's just a theory, though. Looking at the rules on both the
    SonicWall and the ISA Server will give you a better idea of the intended
    function of this design.

    PaulM

    PS - I can't help but notice that a disproportionately large number of
    European, and specifically German IP networks (including my previous
    employer's) have been designed using internal addressing schemes that do
    not conform to RFC1918. Anybody have an educated guess as to why this
    is? It's just a personal curiosity of mine.

    > -----Original Message-----
    > Hi everybody,
    > I'm being confronted with the following existing setup:
    >
    >
    > T1 --------------------------------
    > (Internet | LAN backbone |
    > and VPNs) ------------+---+---+-+-+-+-+---
    > | | | | | | | |
    > | +-------+ local x.x.x.254/24 | | | | | | +-
    > | | Sonic +---------------------+ | | | | +-
    > +--+ Wall | | | | |
    > | Pro +------+ | | | +- SQL
    > +-------+ dmz | | | +-- mail
    > (?) | +--------+ | +--- etc.
    > | | MS ISA | |
    > +--+ 2000 +------+
    > | Server | x.x.x.251/24
    > +--------+
    >
    > The public web server is hosted elsewhere. The LAN comprises
    > 30 workstations.
    > To complicate the matter, the LAN address family x.x.x. is
    > NOT RFC1918-compliant (and is conflicting with existing
    > Internet hosts).
    > The system is up and running, but I cannot understand the
    > bypassing of the ISA server through the direct connection
    > firewall/LAN. And the meaning of DMZ seems to be lost.
    > Anyone can help me to understand the matter ? Thanks in advance
    _______________________________________________
    firewall-wizards mailing list
    firewall-wizards@honor.icsalabs.com
    http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards


  • Next message: Mark Tinberg: "Re: [fw-wiz] Strange setup"

    Relevant Pages

    • Ang: RE: Firewall and DMZ topology
      ... Network Engineer ... Subject: Firewall and DMZ topology ... > The Gartner Group just put Neoteris in the top of its Magic Quadrant, ...
      (Security-Basics)
    • Re: Lets talk about firewalls - what do we as a group think a firewall should be/have?
      ... part of the same network as the LAN. ... Each interface of a firewall should be distinct from ... interfaces, so a "DMZ interface" is not a requirement. ...
      (comp.security.firewalls)
    • Re: Firewall and DMZ topology
      ... > network, Windows and Linux. ... > laptop used as a simple firewall setup. ... > machine and placing it in a DMZ. ... > internal network, one for the DMZ and one for the Internet. ...
      (Security-Basics)
    • RE: Basic Network Configuration
      ... > IMHO the second rule is void, since no traffic should bypass the DMZ. ... that originates from your internal network. ... There is no point in implementing the same firewall ... >> really achieve this benefit if the boxes run different OS ...
      (Security-Basics)
    • Re: Best practices: Two nics but have harware firewall
      ... I am not aware of any application layer filtering in WatchGuard products. ... ISA Firewall Fairy Tales - What Hardware Firewall Vendors Don't Want You ... the firewalls at the Asset Network ... The ISA Server 2004 firewall is the ideal firewall for the Asset Network ...
      (microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs)